Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Kelly recommended that Action Item 1, the development of a Neighborhood-based Community Policing <br />Strategy, involve the participation of neighborhood associations. <br /> <br />Regarding Action Item 4, the suggestion to shift neighborhood involvement to an earlier point in the land use <br />process, Mr. Kelly felt this would reduce contentiousness. He related that the City of Albany utilized a <br />program that required a pre-development meeting between a developer and neighborhood residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly felt that Action Item 6, the neighborhood scoping projects, could serve as a tie-in to opportunity <br />mapping and the growth density allocation that was discussed recently. He added that a scope without a <br />land use aspect with legal weight would “just sit on a shelf.” <br /> <br />Mr. Papé reiterated that he wanted the City to be careful not to make promises of neighborhood-based <br />services (as specified in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Comprehensive Plan) it did not have the <br />resources to deliver. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé thought the focus of the initiative should be participation by the neighborhood associations. He <br />hoped that the larger neighborhood associations would split into appropriately smaller groups. He wanted to <br />determine if the City had every house and area identified as being part of a specific neighborhood associa- <br />tion and whether the associations were effective. He appreciated action items 30 through 35, which sought <br />to enhance the role of neighborhood associations. He concurred with Mayor Piercy’s recommendation that <br />the City provide training that would enhance the functionality of the associations. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman opined that people would participate with neighborhood associations when they knew their <br />time and effort would make a difference. She noted, in regard to scoping, that the NLC had scoped each <br />neighborhood in 2004 and had talked about their priority issues in a subsequent document. She thought the <br />City could cooperate with the neighborhoods to perform their own scoping. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz thanked staff for its work and acknowledged the amount of effort that had gone into the proposed <br />plan. She shared Ms. Bettman’s sentiments regarding “getting buy-in” from the communities. She averred <br />that if the neighborhoods were not interested in participating, the City may as well not pursue the initiative. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for a third round of comments and questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly cited Action Item 24, regarding the Citizen Involvement Strategic Plan, and observed that much <br />good staff work had gone into the first iteration of it and he opined that most of the work went “nowhere.” <br />He thought the item could be eliminated. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thought Action Item 25, which sought to include feedback to participants in project plans, raised a <br />good point and helped people to feel they have been heard. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly echoed Mr. Papé’s comments on action items 30 through 35. Regarding Action Item 30, he <br />encouraged the inclusion of the NLC. He recalled that on occasion the NLC was not considered an official <br />entity of the City and asked that it become one. <br /> <br />In closing, Mr. Kelly opined that it was an embarrassment to see the elimination of the CIC “touted almost <br />as if it was progress.” He agreed with Ms. Taylor that it should be reestablished. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council August 10, 2005 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />