My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Follow-up on 2009 Legislative Policies
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 11/10/08 Meeting
>
Item 3: Follow-up on 2009 Legislative Policies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:43:20 PM
Creation date
11/7/2008 11:33:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2009 Oregon Legislative Session <br /> <br />I <br />NTRODUCTION <br /> <br />As the state's second most populous urban area, Eugene and Springfield serve as the economic, <br />recreational and cultural center for the southern Willamette Valley and much of southwestern <br />Oregon. The urban area population is now more than 200,000. The regional economy is <br />diversified, with emphasis on technology, timber, education and service industries. <br /> <br />The City of Eugene operates under a home rule charter providing for a council/manager form of <br />government. The offices of the mayor and city councilors are nonpartisan, with the mayor elected <br />at-large and one councilor elected from each of eight city wards. <br /> <br />In the past two decades, as a result of property tax limitation measures, specifically Measure 5 in <br />1990 and Measures 47/50 in 1996/1997, the City has gone through a number of budget reduction <br />processes. In the early 1990s as a result of Measure 5, Eugene went through an extensive 18-month <br />process to evaluate City services and potential budget cuts. The City identified and made $5.3 <br />million in budget cuts through eliminating services and reducing personnel. In 1996, voters in <br />Eugene rejected Measure 47 by a 64.5% to 35.5% vote. However, the Measure passed statewide. <br />As a result of Measure 47 and subsequent Measure 50, the City cut services by an additional $8.7 <br />million in services in fiscal years 1998 and 1999. <br /> <br />Despite voter approval of several local option levies, the City’s revenue has not kept pace with the <br />service needs of the community since then. Service levels have been reduced and General Fund <br />reserves have been tapped to forestall deficits that were projected to occur. Despite the fiscal <br />challenges faced by the City, Eugene has to-date maintained an AA bond rating from Moody’s <br />Investors Service. This rating is a positive reflection of the management and performance history <br />of the City. It is supported by the fact that a large percentage of the citizens rate City services <br />positively, and demonstrates that the City is attempting to strategically address the fiscal and <br />service issues facing the community in this decade. <br /> <br /> <br />I. <br /> ES <br />XECUTIVE UMMARY <br /> <br />To assist lawmakers in understanding the broad array of issue areas which can directly affect the <br />City of Eugene, this legislative policy overview provides an issue-by-issue resource. For 2009, the <br />City of Eugene will focus on three broad themes in evaluating legislation: preserving home rule and <br />local flexibility, ensuring revenue for needed services, and preserving livability. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.