Laserfiche WebLink
~~~ <br />original estimate provided for this particular property was much lower. At that time, he <br />indicated his company was about to be evicted because it didn't comply with zoning and had <br />plans drawn to accommodate mixed use, After considerable expense to his company, the <br />plans for accommodation of mixed use were approved. <br />Then, on February 22, 1991, notice was provided which indicated an assessment for his <br />property of about $4,xx0, which was similar to the original quote. However, on <br />approximately March 25,1991, he received an assessment for $7,6x0. <br />He noted that the commercial use of the property is daytime only. After the work day, it is <br />a residence only. He noted that his company has improved the first and second floors <br />extensively. He asked whether or not the actual cost was similar to the bid. After review <br />of available information, it was determined that these amounts were quite similar. He also <br />noted that his business was down far four or five business days because of the construction <br />work. He advised that he has $130,000 into this structure. <br />Mr. Klope confirmed that approximately $4,400 was the original estimate for the assessment <br />for this property. <br />Mr. Guido then observed that the amount of the assessment was nearly double what had <br />been quoted. He also noted that all alterations had been made in conformance with mixed <br />use. <br />Eve McClure also testified. She is also affiliated with Quantum, inc. She asked the <br />Hearings Gfflcial to consider her two earlier letters. She does not agree an the <br />denomination of the property as commercial for these purposes. She emphasized that there <br />are no deliveries to her business and that the business entry is on Washington Street. <br />The Hearings Gfflcial indicated to the parties that he would do a physical observation of the <br />structure at 754 ~V'ashington Street. He also advised that he would leave the record open <br />through Friday, April 12,1991, to receive any additional information or legal analysis which <br />the patrons might wish to supply. Finally, the Hearings Gfflcial indicated that he would be <br />contacting the City Attorney for additional interpretation. <br />There being no further matters to come before the Hearings Gfflcial, the hearing was <br />adjourned. <br />J~-~ ~~~ <br />Jack A. Billings <br />Hearings Official <br />