My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19772
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19772
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:46:47 PM
Creation date
11/12/2008 2:34:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19772
Document_Title
Ordinance levying assessments for alley paving and sanitary sewers between 7th & 8th Avenues from Washington Street to Jefferson Street; and declaring an emergency.
Adopted_Date
4/22/1991
Approved Date
4/22/1991
CMO_Effective_Date
4/22/1991
Signer
Jeffrey R. Miller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />lack 8i~tings <br />April I7, ~9~1 <br />P~g~ ~ <br />uau~ cyan t~au~ ~ riAkKA~c?,L~1NtY y~~ B~~IENT,BiLL1~T~S I~Up4,'O~b <br />states that sectiar~ ? ,17 ~ ~ ~ } ~ b~ "Continues the previous assessment <br />pa~.ic~.es under section 7 ,18 4" . ~ection~ ? .1$ ~ was the riwmber for <br />the predecessar.pravisians, <br />UISC~'~sICN <br />The concept of "~.ritensive use't that appears in the asterisked <br />exp~.a~~t.f o~ ~f "other" in E, C, ? ,175 ~z ~ Eby ~ is not explained in the <br />Code, It is susceptible to seve~`~1 interpretations. <br />~.. It may be a pZann,ing term that takes into account many <br />factors such as: density, size of structures and <br />improvements, activity on the property, tra,f f is ~ noise, odor, <br />lot coverage and other demands upon the infrastructure or <br />impacts upon abutting prapert~.e$. <br />2. It may also be a chart handed reference to the impact of <br />the parcel. i s use upon the traffic using .the al~.ey. In this <br />late~c cor~te~t a single family dwelling ~ s use of a~ alley is <br />less than a mu~.ti--family bu~Iding that takes its parking off <br />the alley. <br />3. Yet another ~A~aning could tle "intensive uses' to the area <br />of ~ buYidzng~much as you have beep asked to do by the owner <br />of 75~ Washington. Cr, some other single factor ~vther than <br />use of the a~,ley~ such as the hours of use Qr access could be <br />used as requested by the ten~~t, <br />If .one just relies upari the ~rords of E.C. 7.275 ~2~ ~b~ ~a the <br />Engineersng staff ha~re properly calculated the "mast intensive user' <br />~~ the p~roel as commercial and then applied the Co, Cwt and C~3 <br />classification to arrive at a factor of 10. This is consistent <br />with the language in E.C. 7. ~.7~ ~~} ~b~ ~ which deals 3n whole parcels <br />and the permissible uses of each parcel under the toning <br />regulations regardless of what the present use is of the parcel. <br />That xs, the potential uses under the existing zoning dictate the <br />factor, not the existing uses. <br />Based upon the legislative history for ~. ~, ~',17~ ~2} {b~ 2a it is <br />reasonable to .interpret the ref erence to "most 1,~tensive u~~'~ t~ <br />mean. the use that puts the greatest amount of gaff is on the alley. <br />.~pplyir~g this interpretation to the pr~s~nt alley assessments, the <br />parcel is zoned MU aid can have uses ranging from ~~-~ residential <br />to C~-~, C-3 or Go. Using th~.s ~,nterpretation on this alley project <br />E~Nl~1T~ <br />RAGE ~ OFD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.