Laserfiche WebLink
Develo ment of tl~e subject property ~~~ay occur Dilly after site review pursuant to Springfield <br />p <br />De~+elopment Code, SDC Article 3l , ~~~}rich rzq~~ires tl~at the design of the proposed <br />develo ment, as conditioned, "mitigates identified negati~le impacts and resolves identified land <br />P . <br />use conflicts," including those ide~~tified here. 31.aba~3}. Each site plan review apphcat2on <br />must include a written description of the development proposal and a site inventory map showing <br />slopes, natural features, and existing public facilities. The development plan must show haw <br />natural features will be modified by construction activity, showing building footprints and <br />elevations as well as parking and circulation, public improvements, drain~~age, and landscaping. <br />Site review a royal o~ a s~ ecif c development proposal on this site will require that the <br />PP P <br />a ~icable resource protection policies of the Metro Plan be addressed, and that appropriate <br />PP <br />rotectian~ be afforded. Accordingly, the site can only be developed after implementation of the <br />P <br />plan's acknowledged program to achieve the purposes of Goal 5. <br />In addition, all wetlands falling under the jurisdiction of the Division of State Lands andlor the <br />Co s of Engineers will be protected as required by applicable state and federal laws and <br />rP <br />regulations. The forested wetland, drainage ditcl~, and wet meadow area ident~f ed ~n the EDA <br />Stud as "the most significant wetland resource area" on the site has been identified on the <br />.Y <br />a licant's conceptual plan copy attached as "Enhanced wetland" and shall be fully protected <br />PP <br />under an develo meet plan that is approved. <br />Y P <br />Goal 6 ~ Air, .wat.er and I;~~nd Resources Quali#y~. This goal requires that local <br />com rehensive plans and implementing measures be consistent with state and federal regulations <br />P <br />governing air, water, and land resources quality.. An LRAPA analysis of emiss~ons from the <br />nearb industrial area confirms that those industries are operating within existing safety standards <br />y .. <br />and that exposures on the site are well below those standards. ~ In addition, the appl~cat~on, as <br />modified, calls for an industrial buffer area east of the only existing heavy industrial facility near <br />the site, the Neste resin. plant. This area will be designated for Light~Medium 1'ndustrial use, <br />excludin all residential uses and ermittina onl light manufacturing, assembly, and warehouse <br />g P b Y <br />t e uses, roviding both a buffer .and a logical transition. Based upon the. models which <br />YP P <br />LRAPA has developed, the proposed buffer will provide far more protection to the residents of <br />S rin wood than is re aired by any applicable statute or regulation. It will provide many times <br />P g q <br />the . rotection afforded to plant workers under federal law. And it will provide substantially <br />F .. <br />mare separat~an from Springwood than ~~s currently enjoyed by~ residents of the trailer park dust <br />north of the lant. The matrices and printouts that LRAPA has provided project potential <br />P <br />concentrations of formaldehyde ~n the air at vanous distances to the east of the plant when the <br />wind is blowin from the west. The matrix specif es 14 wind speeds and b air stability levels. <br />g <br />At an specific distance and direction, the projected concentration would exist only when the <br />y <br />~vind was blowing in that direction at the specif ed speed under the specif ed air stability <br />condition. ~ ~~ <br />3 <br /> <br />