Laserfiche WebLink
<br />conducted hearings to consider the matter on June 13, 1991 and July 11, 1991. <br /> <br />E At the conclusion of the Metropolitan Policy Committee hearings, the <br />Committee found that additional modification of the proposed amendment was necessary <br />to resolve those issues which resulted in the divergent decisions by the governing bodies <br />of each of the respective three jurisdictions, and recommended such modification. The <br />Metropolitan Policy Committee further suggested that the governing body of each <br />jurisdiction set a date, time and place for a public hearing to receive and consider <br />testimony on the differences between the initial application and the modification as <br />recommended by the Metropolitan Policy Committee. <br /> <br />G. By Resolution duly adopted on July 22, 1991, the City Council of the City of <br />Eugene accepted the recommendation of the Metropolitan Policy Committee as set forth <br />in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and directed that a <br />public hearing be held on September 9, 1991 to consider the differences between the <br />initial application and the recommended modification. <br /> <br />H. Evidence exists within the record and the findings attached hereto that the <br />proposal as modified meets the requirements of Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971, the <br />requirements of applicable state and local law, and is necessary because circumstances <br />have changed in a substantial manner from those originally contemplated in the Metro <br />Plan. <br /> <br />NO~ THEREFORE, <br /> <br />THE CIlY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. The above findings, and the findings set forth in Exhibit B, attached <br />hereto and incorporated herein by reference are adopted. <br /> <br />Section 2. The Metro Plan Diagram land use designation of the property identified <br />as Map 17-02-31, Tax Lots 300 and 700 are amended as depicted on Exhibit A to Exhibit <br />A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. <br /> <br />Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this <br />Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent <br />jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, <br />and such holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. <br /> <br />Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption of identical <br />amendments to the Metro Plan by the Springfield City Council and Lane County Board <br /> <br />Ordinance - 2 <br />