Ordinance No. 19807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the full ~~~-foot method, used to prepare rel iminar estim to hearin ~ P Y , a ~ for the LID g, was equ ~ tabl a g~ ven the method of ser~v~ ce del ~ very. Staff ex 1 ored twa other methods that resulted i n i de R nt i cal areas of assessment but 1 ess than that previously calculated, The equivalent 1 of method i s a reca ni method that has b ~ g zed een used ~n the past and cQnf~rmed the preferred method outlined in the memo to you. rrregardless of which method is used t e - sul is are t h re he same. The cast of the improvement did not go up, however, the method of rise ssmet~t resulted in a mare equitable distribution, As evidenced in the he ri one ro ert owner h ~ n9, only p .p Y as indicated a concern with the method; throe others whore ~n attendance. dal cal at i an errors Mr. Langan referred to one other calculation error re ardin the me distr7butin ~ 9 thad Qf g right-of-way costs. Staff have reviewed the claim end find the method used ~s cans ~ that intent with past pract~Ce. Mr, Langan may disa ree with the method, however, the method has be 9 en used cans stently aver the past several years where right-af-way has been secured for an assessment a' pr sect, As to the claim that the EWER overbilled far the hydrant staff' the b i 7 l i n ~ have rev ~ awed g and have found the b~ ~ i i ng far the hydrant to be cansi stent with current EWEB po~iCy, There was no double billing; in these settin s h drants are bi 1 i ed separately fror~ the water line ~/ g y exten~~~nr section ~,~~~ Mr. Langan i s the only property owner that has voiced concern re a ' rov~d~n i g rd~ng staff p g nformat~ on and the method of assessment. Section 1 ~ ~~~ La ~m ravements - carat v ' ' ~ cal p ~ e Prav~ s ~ ans, prove des guidance to the heari nga off i - C~al ar~d Caunc~l on haw to remedy the Complaints. Staff recomme hearin s o ' ' • nds that the 9 ff~cial review this seet~an and provide the Caunci~ with - ed sal ut~ans, recommend Cancl us i an Staff recommends that the hearings official a rave the assessme . tion as outline pp nt d~str~bu- d ~ n the prev~ aus memo except as noted above ~ The onl c - rectian staff recommends is to have the ~~ Y ar qty bear ~~lo of the hydrant cost in an effort to 1 imi t overal ~ City cast to process an amendme nt. ._