Ordinance No. 19829 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

balance of the property would be subject to assessment as provided by EC 7.1755). It is the recommendation of the Hearings 4fbcial that the property be assessed accordingly, B. Mescall Pro e This property abuts both Lake and Dak Drives, These are two separate tax lots with the same ownership. Dne of the lots was assessed in the River Road existing sewer district in 199U from Lake Drive. That lot connected to the sewer prior to the adoption of the N[wMC charge. The other lot, which abuts on Oak Drive, is proposed for assessment for these sewers. This lot is under common development with the other lot and does not have a separate service; For that reason, staff recommends that no MwMC charge be assessed, which the Hearings Official also recommends. Again, the Hearings Dfbcial beds that this property is subject to assessment for this additional round of sewer construction and recommends that the City Council assess the property in accordance with the staff recommendation, C. Hunter Property, This is a two acre parcel which has now been acquired by the sans of the prior owners. They have advised that there is a 55-year old house on one corner of the property, Since the street is the southern boundary there was an assessment against the property when the sewer was installed in Howard Avenue in 1991; This property is also connected to Rosewood Avenue, and a sewer in that street has been constructed as a part of this construction, This has resulted in another assessment. The Hunters understand that there may be yet another assessment in the future, This is also a property that was examined by the Hearings Dfbcial. It is a barge and generally undeveloped piece of property. There would appear to be na basis in the Eugene Code not to assess this property, since the assessments have been based on the 16o-foot provision. Therefore, the Hearings official finds that the proposed assessment is in accordance with the Eugene Code and recommends that the City Council assess the property as proposed by staff. 3. Limited Develo meat Pro erties. Some property owners have concluded that they are limited in development possibilities and request that the sewer assessments be adjusted accordingly. -b-