Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy recognized Councilor Bettman for a motion on an unrelated matter. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman distributed copies of the resolution passed by the council in regard to the police auditor, <br />and indicated she would offer a motion to repeal the previous ballot title. She thanked City Manager Ruiz <br />and City Attorney Klein for their assistance in developing the new ballot title. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to repeal Resolution No. 4949, <br />a resolution calling a City election. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Clark, City Attorney Klein said that the council could not change <br />the certified ballot title unless someone filed a lawsuit in Circuit Court; the motion would allow him to <br />prepare a new ballot title in keeping with Councilor Bettman’s wishes. Councilor Clark asked if a vote in <br />favor of the motion would allow for a council work session to review the new title. City Attorney Klein said <br />no; he would have to certify the ballot title by August 4, and invited council input prior to that time via e- <br />mail. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from City Attorney Klein, City Recorder Mary Feldman reviewed the process <br />timeline. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark asked how the resolution would affect City Attorney Klein’s judgment on the ballot title. <br />City Attorney Klein suggested that drafting a ballot title was an art rather than a science, and one could have <br />100 reasonable ballot titles for one measure. He thought his title was reasonable, and that the title Councilor <br />Bettman included in her e-mail was appropriate to include in a title, although perhaps not absolutely <br />necessary. He reiterated his invitation for additional input. He said the title must be consistent with State <br />law, and that was his goal. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:3; councilors Solomon, Poling, and Clark voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to adopt Resolution No. 4954, <br />which shall consist of the same title and provisions as were in Resolution No. 4949. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed 5:3; councilors Solomon, Poling, and Clark voting no. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to direct the City Manager to di- <br />rect legal counsel to adopt a ballot title, caption, question, and summary generally consis- <br />tent with the language provided in her e-mail dated July 28, 2008. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said that the e-mail contained language that concerned him. He determined from City <br />Attorney Klein that he would interpret the motion as the council’s indication of what it would like the ballot <br />title to be. Councilor Clark thought the language provided by Councilor Bettman offered greater clarity in <br />some regards, but he thought it less clear in regard to the duties of the auditor. He had hoped for more <br />specificity with the intent reflected in the title, but was unclear as to how to accomplish that. He indicated <br />he would have to vote in opposition to the motion because the time for discussion was not adequate. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 28, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Meeting <br />