Laserfiche WebLink
In regard to noise, Councilor Bettman said that a mining operation would be operating within 150 feet of <br />people’s houses, creating noise, dust, and other impacts. She maintained that the decision would not put the <br />company out of business as it had additional resources. <br /> <br />In regard to the sufficiency of the resource, Councilor Bettman said the issue was whether it was adequate to <br />justify the elimination of farm land and the impact on the neighbors. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark supported Councilor Poling’s motion. While he acknowledged the applicant’s interest in <br />completing the process, after the loss of Hynix and its jobs he did not want to see the council act too quickly <br />without considering all the issues thoroughly. He thought the council should take the time to get each <br />element of the decision right. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon thought it was a sad day when the City punished a company for something it had <br />allowed. She pointed out that the home buyers in this case were not victims as they had bought their <br />property with knowledge of the mining operation. She said that anyone who toured the site would see the <br />site was quite large and production was moving away from the home sites back onto the deeper part of the <br />property. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote on the amendment to the motion was a 4:4 tie; councilors Solomon, <br />Poling, Pryor, and Clark voting yes, and councilors Taylor, Bettman, Ortiz, and Zelenka <br />voting no, <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy expressed appreciation to Delta Sand and Gravel for all the jobs it provided and for the <br />materials it provided to the community, but she agreed with the staff. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy cast a vote in opposition to the motion and it failed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote on the main motion was a 4:4 tie; councilors Taylor, Bettman, Ortiz, <br />and Zelenka voting yes, and councilors Solomon, Poling, Pryor, and Clark voting yes; <br />Mayor Piercy cast a vote in support of the motion and it passed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />6. ACTION: <br />An Ordinance Concerning Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan Text; Amending the <br />Willakenzie Area Plan Text; Adopting an Exception to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willamette <br />River Greenway; Adopting Severability and Saving Clauses; and Providing an Effective Date <br />(I-5 Willamette Bridge Project, Eugene Files MA 07-03, RA 08-01; Springfield file LRP2007- <br />00010; Lane County file PA08-5230); <br />and <br /> <br />An Ordinance Amending the Willakenzie Area Plan Text in the Willamette Greenway Section; <br />Adopting an Exception to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willamette River Greenway; and <br />Adopting a Severability Clause <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved that the City Council adopt <br />Council Bill 4981, an ordinance amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Gen- <br />eral Plan (Metro Plan) text. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jerome reported that staff had learned of an ex parte contact that occurred in regard to the <br />item, which had been noticed to the public for the purpose of rebuttal. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 28, 2008 Page 9 <br /> Meeting <br />