My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19862
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19862
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:47:20 PM
Creation date
11/14/2008 4:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19862
Document_Title
An ordinance concerning hazardous substance discharge & removal; adding sections 6.340, 6.345, 6.350, 6.355, 6.360, 6.365, 6.370, 6.375, & 6.380 to Eugene Code, 1971; & amending section 6.990 of that code.
Adopted_Date
6/22/1992
Approved Date
6/22/1992
CMO_Effective_Date
7/23/1992
Signer
Jeffrey R. Miller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~4~ Any person who receives and complies with the terms of an <br />order issued pursuant to subsection ~3~ of this section may, within 60 days <br />after completion of the required action, petition the city manager far <br />reimbursement for the reasonable costs of such action. If the city manager <br />denies reimbursement, the person may appeal the city manager's denial to a <br />hearings off i cer i n ,accordance with the timelines and procedures established by <br />section 3.060 of this code. To obtain reimbursement, the person must establish <br />by a preponderance of the evidence that the person i s not a respons i bl a party, <br />and that the costs for which the person seeks reimbursement are reasonable i n <br />1 i ght of the action required by the relevant order; these criteria are the sol e <br />basis for reimbursement. <br />~5~ If any responsible party fai 1 s without sufficient cause to <br />conduct a removal action as required by an order of the city manager issued <br />under ~subsecti an ~3} of this section, the responsible party shall be l i ab1 a to <br />the city for the qty's removal action costs and for punitive damages Hat to <br />exceed three times the amount of the city's removal action costs. <br />6.315 Hazardous Substance -Prohibition on Bui 1 di n . Where the city <br />manager has reason to believe that a proposed bui 1 d i ng site i s <br />contaminated by a rel ease of hazardous substances, and that such contamination <br />poses an i~ni Went threat to the public health, safety and welfare, the ci t <br />~ r Y <br />manager may ref use to ~ ssue a ,bu ~ 1 d~ ng perms t, or where a perms t has been <br />~ ssued, stop work on the perms t, unt i 1 such time as a removal action i s <br />implemented. If the responsible party can demonstrate that construction and the <br />removal action can occur simultaneously, and satisfies the city manager that the <br />removal action will continue even i f constructi on i s allowed to proceed, the <br />city manager may authorize construction to continue or may issue permits prior <br />to completion of the removal action. In order to ensure completion of the <br />removal action, the city manager may requi re a bond i n an amount sufficient to <br />cover the costs of the removal action. <br />6.380 Hazardous Substance -,.,,V,iolations In addition to the penalties set <br />forth i n subsections ~8~ , ~9} , and ~ 10} of section 6.990 of th i s <br />code: <br />. ~a} For violations of sections 6.345 to 6.315 of this code, <br />the c~ ty manager may proceed either by imposing an administrative <br />civil penalty pursuant to section 2.018 of this code, except that <br />the amount of the penalty shall be governed by subsection ~b~ of <br />this section or subsections ~8}, ~9} or ~10~ of section 6.990, or <br />by citing responsible party into municipal court. <br />~b~ In setting the amount of a ci vi 1 penalty, the city <br />manager ~ for an adm~ ni strati ve ci vi 1 penal ty~ and the municipal <br />court shall impose a penalty sufficient t0 deter persons from <br />v~olat~ng sections 6.345 to 6.315 of this code, and shall be not <br />less than three times the economic benefit which the respan s i bl e <br />party would derive i f the violation had not been di scavered. <br />Section 2. Sect i On 6.990 of the Eugene Code, 1911, i s amended by add i n <br />9 <br />Ord i Hance - 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.