Laserfiche WebLink
1. Fallowing the public. hearing, the Tree Commission held three work <br />sessions to consider the testimony, questionnaire responses, and prepare its <br />recommendation for Council consideration, <br />S. In addition to a public hearing on December 3, 1991, the Planning <br />Commission held three work sessions to consider the draft Plan. Notice of <br />the public hearing was mailed to all parties who testified orally ar in writ- <br />ing at the Tree Commission hearing as well as to other parties who requested <br />that they be kept informed of the process. <br />9. The Council Committee on Infrastructure held two meetings to con- <br />sider the Planning Commission and Tree Commission recommendations and to <br />discuss passible additional options regarding policies and proposed actions <br />pertaining to trees on private property and heritage trees, as well as Plan <br />implementation costs. Results of these meetings were forwarded to the City <br />Council far its consideration, <br />10. On March 4, 199, the City Council held a work session on the draft <br />Plan. The Council held a public hearing on April 13, 199, to consider pub- <br />lic testimony, the record, and the recommendations of the Tree Commission and <br />the Planning Cammi ssi an, as we11 as the Counci 1 Cammi ttee on Infrastructure <br />report. Notice of that hearing was mailed to all parties that testified in <br />writing ar in person at the Tree Commission ar Planning Commission hearings. <br />11. Both scaping sessions, and al] meetings of the Tree Commission, the <br />Tree Commission Urban Forest Management P1 an Committee, the Planning Commis- <br />sion, the Council Committee on Infrastructure, and the City Council were <br />announced in advance in The Eugene Rego„s„ter-Guard, a local newspaper of gen- <br />eral circulation, and were open to the pub1 i c. <br />12. Notice was provided tv the Land Conservation and Development Cam- <br />mi ss i on on January 3, 1992 concerning the proposed adoption of the Urban <br />Forest Management P1 an. <br />13. Based on the public testimony, options developed by the Counci 1 <br />Committee on Infrastructure, the recommendations of the Tree Commission and <br />the P1 anni ng Cammi ssi on, and its own del i berati ans, the City Counci 1 has <br />determined that the City of Eugene Urban Forest Management Plan i s cans i stent <br />with the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan area General P1 an as acknowledged by <br />the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission. Therefore, the <br />Urban Forest Management Plan is consistent with applicable Statewide Planning <br />Goals. <br />14. The Urban Forest Management Plan will assist in implementing cer- <br />tain policies in the Metro Plan as amended through December, 1991. These <br />include: <br />~a} Metropolitan goals relating to scenic quality, water quality, <br />vegetation and wi 1 dl i fe, open space, and recreational potential shall be <br />given a higher priority than timber harvest within the urban growth <br />boundary. Policy 14, page III-C-9} <br />fib} Natural vegetation, natural water features, and drainageways <br />shall be protected and retained to the maximum extent practicable, con- <br />sidering the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences in <br />the design and construction of urban developments, and landscaping shall <br />be utilized to enhance those natural features. ~Palicy 2, page III-E-3} <br />Ordinance Page 2 <br />