My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19916
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:47:38 PM
Creation date
11/18/2008 4:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19916
Document_Title
Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area Plan diagram to include property located on the east side of Spring Blvd. in the urban growth boundary; to designate the property low density residential; and adopting a severability clause.
Adopted_Date
5/6/1993
Approved Date
5/6/1993
CMO_Effective_Date
6/6/1993
Signer
Ruth Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe of the existing urban <br />areas; <br />As noted in the findings of fact, the adapted urban growth boundary of the Metropolitan <br />Plan along Spring Boulevard in this vicinity is 160 feet east of the right of way. The <br />addition of this area inside the urban growth boundary will not materially alter the <br />character of the area or the efficiency of land uses along the fringe of the urban area. <br />Environmental, enemy, economic and social consequences; <br />Generally, the environmental, energy, economic, and social consequences of this proposal <br />are almost negligible. The most notable impact of this request would be any precedent <br />it may set for consideration of other properties being included in the urban growth <br />boundary in this area. The Eugene City Council in initiating this request was specific <br />about the facts of this case and the need to rectify an error caused by Eugene. In terms <br />of energy efficiency, the subject area is close to an existing residential collector street and <br />the addition of this property inside the urban growth boundary will not noticeably increase <br />the demand for added transportation facilities. <br />There do not appear to be any social impacts associated with this request. The mast <br />significant economic impact is the cost of extending public services to this property. As <br />noted in the fiindings of facts and other portions of this evaluation, these services and <br />facilities can be extended with no additional costs to the public. <br />Retention of agricultural land as del~ined with Class I being the highest priority for <br />retention and Class VI the lowest priority; and <br />The area of this Metro Plan request is not classified as having agricultural soils ar land and <br />thus retention of agricultural land is not applicable to this request. <br />Compatibility of proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural activities, <br />There are no agricultural uses in the vicinity to this request. The surrounding land inside <br />the urban growth boundary is designated for low-density residential use. tither lands <br />nearby located outside the urban growth boundary are designated either Parks and open <br />Space or Forest Land. <br />Goal 15 -Willamette River Greenway: The area of this request is not located in the <br />Willamette River Greenway and no findings are required under this goal. <br />Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metropolitan Plan internally <br />inconsistent. <br />Exhibit A -Findings - 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.