Ordinance No. 19917 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The other soil t e found on these lots is Chapman urban complex. This soil has no YP in because of the variety of natural and man-made materials. This type of soil rat g re wires fertilizers and irrigation and for the same reasons cited above, does not q make farm use a suitable choice. Other factors which inhibit the use of these lots for accepted `farm practices•or su ort for commercial agricultural enterprises .are found in the Exception 'PP ort and include lot size, adjacent uses and "developed and discussion of this rep conimi t ted" status . h se~lots should be converted from agricultural to residential. and from rural to Te urban use based on the findings in the Exception discussion of this report. Goal 14 Housing ~. ' ro osal will convert 3.69 acres of E--40 agricultural land to low density This p p ain of 10 to 12 building sites. residential. This represents a potential net g ' e this land would 'oin an existing residential inventory of several thousand Whil J e 'it is im ortant to note that need is not at issue, The developed and acr s, P mmitted discussion elsewhere in this report pre-empts the additional exceptions co irement to determine need. These lots and, the adjacent neighborhood are requ irrevvcabl committed to single family residential development. The small acreage Y ' v lved in this re nest will be provided With full urban services Whether, the land in o q is ever develo ed beyond existing densities or not. The, conversion from P rve the inte rit of the existing housing and agricultural to residential will prese g Y the neighborhood by maintaining consistent land use regulations. Related findings to Goal l0 ORS cha ter 197.0053}, Comprehensive Land Use Planning Coordination states: ~ P "...cities and counties should remain as the agencies to consider, promote and mono a the local aspects of land conservation and development for the best Interests g of the people within their jurisdictions." RS 191.010 states: "The .Legislative Assembly declares that, in order to assure the O hi hest ossible level of livability in Oregon, it is necessary to provide for g P erl re ared and coordinated comprehensive plans for cities `and prop Y P P • 3 Shall be the basis for more specific counties...These comprehensive plans: ~ } les and land use re ulations which implement the policies expressed through the ru g com rehensive plans; ~4} Shall be prepared to assure that all public actions are p• with the olicies ex ressed through the comprehensive consistent and coordinated P P ions' and 5 Shall be regularly reviewed and, if necessary, amended to keep them ~ } he are desi ned to P '~ h n in needs and desires of the public t y g consistent With the c a g g serve." The ro ert owners are in support of this action because of their desire to reside P •p Y with full urban services. These services are or in on their land and be provided time will be adjacent to these lots. All adjoining praperty•is within the UGB and J is ex acted to be developed at urban densities. The proximity of existing and P ro osed urban develo ~ment makes the inclusion of these lots consistent with the P P • P h and S rin field as the ro~vider of fundamental principle of compact urban groWt p g P urban services. Exhibit A -- Findings -- 8