My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: 2009 Legislative Policies Document
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 11/24/08 Work Session
>
Item B: 2009 Legislative Policies Document
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:45 PM
Creation date
11/20/2008 5:19:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/24/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2009 Oregon Legislative Session <br /> <br />B. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS AND 9-1-1 SERVICES <br /> <br />B1. Protection of 9-1-1 Tax Revenues <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene opposes the use of dedicated 9-1-1 funds from being expended for any purpose <br />other than 9-1-1 services. <br /> <br />2001 and 2002 legislative actions resulted in the loss of 9-1-1- tax revenue and the elimination of <br />all operating reserves. Since then, the revenue has not kept pace with expenditures, resulting in an <br />FTE reduction in FY06. In FY09, the tax is expected to provide $1.7 million in revenue. Although <br />the tax was reauthorized in 2007 to continue seamless 9-1-1 service throughout Lane County and <br />the State of Oregon, it is important to keep those dedicated funds from being expended for any <br />purpose other than 9-1-1 services. Diversion of 9-1-1 funds from the intended purpose for which <br />they were collected from the public, can significantly set back the implementation and advancement <br />of life-saving enhanced 9-1-1 technology. <br /> <br />B2. 9-1-1 Telephone Excise Tax – Adequacy and Distribution <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene supports increased revenue to local jurisdictions to operate 9-1-1 systems. <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene supports a reevaluation of the 1% guaranteed distribution floor to counties. <br /> <br />Revenue from the 9-1-1 telephone excise tax needs to be closely monitored to ensure that it <br /> <br />adequately covers the full local cost of providing this mandated service. <br /> <br />B3. Flexibility For PSAP Alignment <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene supports legislation authorizing merit-based flexibility for multiple PSAP <br /> <br />configuration in a county, using levels of services and realized cost savings as criteria. <br /> <br />The City recognizes that some consolidation of Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP) should <br />occur statewide. However, a one-size-fits-all approach of consolidating to a single PSAP per <br />county could prove costly and reduce levels of service in Lane County and other regions. Lane <br />County includes four PSAPs geographically spread out across the Oregon Coast, Willamette Valley, <br />and Cascades, providing high standards of emergency response that a single PSAP alignment would <br />be hard pressed to meet. Additionally, consolidation to a single PSAP might necessitate costs for <br />new facilities. <br /> <br />B4. Non-Emergency Number <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene opposes the establishment of a single, statewide non-emergency number. Instead, <br />the City supports local control in listing non-emergency police agency numbers in the front <br />section of the telephone book. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.