My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: West University Park Reconfiguration
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 09/28/05 WS
>
Item B: West University Park Reconfiguration
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:17:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2005 9:28:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />common property line on the southern park edge. These design considerations on the adjacent private <br />property are likely to further reduce the chance of future negative use in the proposed park. <br /> <br />The proposal was presented at a West University Neighborhood (WUN) board meeting on July 28, <br />2005, and discussed at a WUN general meeting the following week. The WUN board passed a <br />resolution endorsing the proposal. While strongly opposing reopening the park in its current <br />configuration, both the University Small Business Association and Eugene Police have cautiously <br />endorsed reopening the proposed, reconfigured park. <br /> <br />A separate meeting organized by Parks and Open Space Division staff to gather public comment on the <br />proposal was held on August 25. Input from nearby property owners was also directly solicited by mail. <br />During the meeting, the owner presented his proposal and a draft list conditions, and responded to a <br />variety of questions. A summary of all public comments submitted on the subject of the trade proposal <br />is provided in Attachment C, including a letter questioning the fairness of the owner’s request for a right <br />of first refusal on a future purchase of the reconfigured park property. <br /> <br />The proposed park site would be approximately 2600 square feet smaller than the existing park site. A <br />third party appraisal conducted by Duncan Brown, Inc. states the following: <br /> <br /> Area (square feet) $ Per Square Foot Total <br />Before Exchange <br />City Parcel 16,032 $22 $352,704 <br />After Exchange <br />City Parcel 13,430 $25 $335,750 <br />Difference <br /> -$16,954 <br /> <br />Before Exchange <br />Owner Parcel 16,020 $25 $400,500 <br />After Exchange <br />Owner Parcel 18,622 $22 $409,684 <br />Difference <br /> $9,184 <br /> <br />The appraisal places the difference in raw land value of the two parcels following an exchange as <br />proposed at $26,138 ($16,954 + 9,184). Under the proposed conditions of agreement, the owner would <br />pay the City this value difference, rounded to a total of $30,000 to support park improvements. The City <br />would agree to use this revenue to fund the installation of irrigated turf grass as a base condition for the <br />newly reconfigured neighborhood park. <br /> <br />Other Background Information <br />The site for West University Park was identified in 1976 and acquired the following year to provide a <br />neighborhood park serving the West University area. All funds for acquisition and development of the <br />park were provided by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, managed by Housing and <br />Urban Development (HUD). HUD representatives have indicated that the exchange proposal does not <br />trigger any special process requirements through its association with CDBG funding, but that the <br />exchange would place limitations on eligibility for future CDBG funds for West University Park. <br /> <br />Timing is of critical importance to this proposal. The owners desire to complete their housing <br />redevelopment project by September 2006 whether or not this proposal is accepted. They are therefore <br />requesting a response to the proposal offer by October 1, 2005, in order to be able to pursue alternate <br />development plans if this proposal is deemed unacceptable. <br /> <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050928\S050928B.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.