Ordinance No. 19957 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FINDINGS AND RECQMMENDATIQNS SUBJECT: CONCRETE ALLEY AND DRAINAGE BETWEEN CHESHIRE STREET AND CLARK STREET, FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO MADISON STREET (CONTRACT #93-24) (JOB #2945) BACKGROUND 'This project was initiated by a petition poll letters from property awners. Pro er owners within . p tY the LID suppart~ng the nnprovement wdl bear 5~ percent of the assessable cost. This ra'ect was a roved under the subsid r ~ P ~ • pp y p ogram with benefits applying where properb.es owners are eligible. Based an the petita.on pall letters}, the City Engineer initiated the project, as rovided for in the Eu ene Code 7.1 P g 608} on December 4,1992 and the City Council formed the LTD on 1u1y 2~, 1993. The protect has been completed and final assessment costs have been calculated. . PRQJECT The project included construction of a concrete alley and storm sewers with ad`ustments of surrounding property's were necessary to match the new facility. ASSESSMENT Under City of Eugene assessment policy, H 1 percent of the improvement costs will be distributed to the abutting property awners with the balance financed by the City. Below are the final unit assessable .costs. Alley paving $ 12.691firant foot Alley paving $ 0.141square foot Costs listed below are based on the engineer's estimate and prelimin casts uated to ro er awners at the L ~ ~ p P ~ oval Improvement Dzstnct hearing following bid opening. Alley paving $ 14.89/front foot Alley paving $ 0.17/square foot One property within the LID qualified for partial subsidy for the street assessment for a total subsidy alloca~an of $3,214.14. RECOMMENDATION A public hearing regarding the proposed assessment was scheduled for ~.~0 P.M. on Febru 17 1994. Nor nest to be heard or wri ~ • ' eq tten testimony was received. However, the Hearnng Off~c~al received an February 17, 1994 Memorandum from the City Engineer autlinin the above g information. Based upon the available informa~on, it is the finding of the Hearings Official that this ro'ect has been initiated bid and cons ' ' p ~ ' trotted rn accordance with the pravxs~ons of the Eugene Code. It ~s the further finding of the Hearings Official that the final improvement costs are lower than noted at the local im ravement h q p ear~ng, are comparable to those of other similar projects, and that the assessments have been properly calculated as to the bene~tting properties.