My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19962
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:48:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2008 2:03:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19962
Document_Title
Authorizing the institution of proceedings in eminent domain for the acquisition of property interests along Terry Street from Royal Avenue to Barger Drive, for the purposes of construction of street improvements; and declaring an emergency.
Adopted_Date
4/11/1994
Approved Date
4/11/1994
CMO_Effective_Date
4/11/1994
Signer
Ruth F. Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />SUBJECT: PROPOSED PAVING, SIDEWALKS, STREET LIGHTS AND <br />STORM SEWER ON TERRY STREET BETWEEN ROYAL AVENUE <br />AND BARGER DRIVE. (JOB #2813) <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Terry Street between Royal Avenue and Barger Drive, is proposed to be improved during sunnner, <br />1994. This project has been included in the City Council adopted Fiscal Year '94' Capital Budget <br />The project description calls for the street to be improved to a 46-foot width (12-foot travel lanes, a <br />12-foot center lane and two 5-foot bike lanes) with curbs and gutters, storm sewers, street lights . <br />and continuous sidewalk on the east side of Terry Street This is a project that the City Council can <br />initiate per Section 7.160(5) of the Municipal Code and it is required that a series of hearings be <br />conducted to assure an opportunity for public input. Even though the March 21, 1994 public <br />hearing is not required by code, the nature of the project and unique circumstances regarding one <br />of the properties suggest that a hearing is warranted. Currently, over 57.8% of the assessable cost <br />is represented by either .irrevocable petitions or other petitions for improvement. Technically this <br />percentage allows the City Engineer to initiate design and bidding, however, the unique <br />circumstances still suggest formal council action. <br /> <br />An informational meeting was conducted March 9, 1994. Out of six (6) properties proposed to be <br />assessed for a portion of the project cost, none of the property owners attend the informational <br />meeting. Three hundred letters were sent out to residents in the proposed improvement district <br />with 20 attending. The bulk of the letters went to tenants of Woodland Mobile Home Park, <br />Daneland Mobile Home Park and Summerfield Mobile Home Park. A common concern was <br />traffic flow and how the assessment costs would be distributed among the owners. <br /> <br />PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> <br />The project will address the drainage problems, the infrastructure and transportation needs in the <br />area, and provide a facility that can be maintained efficiently. It includes street paving, sidewalks, <br />street lights and storm sewers. <br /> <br />FUNDING A.ND ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />Current City policy states that all properties abutting streets that have not been improved to City <br />standards will participate in the improvement cost Assessments are a major source of revenue for <br />financing street and storm sewer improvements. Systems Development and deferral funds will be <br />used to finance the non-assessable costs. . <br /> <br />The City is proposing: <br /> <br />1. That abutting property owners be assessed on a front footage basis for curbs and gutters, <br />the assessable portion of the1pavement width and for any driveway improvements as <br />outlined in Chapter 7 of the Municipal Code. Based on historical project costs, the <br />estimated assessment unit costs are: <br /> <br />20-foot equivalent <br />28-foot equivalent <br />36-foot equivalent <br />44-foot equivalent <br /> <br />$ 65.00/front foot <br />$ 87.50/front foot <br />$109.50/front foot <br />$ 131.50/front foot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.