My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19989
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:48:13 PM
Creation date
11/21/2008 2:50:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19989
Document_Title
Concerning Metro Plan amendments; amending sections 9.015, 9.120, 9.124, 9.126, 9.128, 9.130, 9.132, 9.134, & 9.136 of the Eugene Code, 1971; adding new sections 9.118 & 9.119 to that code; & repealing section 9.122 of that code.
Adopted_Date
11/9/1994
Approved Date
11/9/1994
CMO_Effective_Date
12/10/1994
Signer
Ruth Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the City Council is not bound by the determination of the planning director or <br />Metropolitan Policy Committee. <br />Section 9.015 of the Eugene Code,1971 currently defines a Plan Update Amendment <br />as "Any change to the Metropalitan Plan which ~1} changes the urban growth <br />boundary or the jurisdictional boundary of the Plan; ~2} requires a goal exception to <br />be taken under statewide planning goal 2; ~3} amends a fundamental principle, <br />metropolitan goal ar 'policy set out in Chapter II of the Plan, ar ~4} requires a <br />substantial diversion of budgeted planning resources from the approved work <br />programs of affected city departments. That definition will be amended to reflect the <br />Type I and Type II amendments referenced in Section 2 above. <br />The proposed amendment does not change the urban growth boundary ar the <br />jurisdictional boundary of the Metropolitan Plan. The changes are .restricted to the <br />Plan amendments and refinements section of Chapter IV and do not require an <br />exception to statewide planning goal 2 nor do they amend a fundamental principle, <br />metropolitan goal or policy set out in Chapter II of the Plan. The proposed changes <br />are being processed within the existing budgets of the planning departments of the <br />three metropolitan jurisdictions and within the scope of intergovernmental agreement <br />related to the on-going maintenance, monitoring, review and amendment to the <br />Metropolitan Area General Plan entered into by the three metropolitan jurisdictions <br />and the Lane Council of Governments. <br />Exhibit A - 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.