My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19995
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:48:15 PM
Creation date
11/21/2008 2:57:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19995
Document_Title
Ordinance concerning residential development; and amending sections 9.035, 9.512, 9.546, and 9.620 of the Eugene Code, 1971.
Adopted_Date
12/7/1994
Approved Date
12/7/1994
CMO_Effective_Date
1/7/1995
Signer
Ruth Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
language in the adapted plans described above, <br />The secondary access requirement, which is essentially a modification to the current <br />requirement in the PUD ordi:na.nce and also applying it to subdivisions, has relevance to Land <br />Use Policy 5 in TransPlan: <br />Muaimize the adverse impact of the automobile on local residential streets through the <br />selective use of alternative street designs and application of traffic management <br />techniques. Page 4.} <br />This policy includes several implementation strategies, such as traffic diverters and providing <br />far adequate arterial and collector streets. The proposal here to require secondary access <br />addresses this policy at the initial street planning stage. It is intended to disperse traffic onto <br />more than just one local street when larger developments are proposed. Additionally, it <br />looks at the overall use of a local street in the aggregate, so if a development proposal <br />increases the use of a local street beyond 191ots, and that local street is the only means of <br />ingress and egress ~i. e. , it is the only way in and the only way out}, then access to another <br />street is required when feasible. If access to a development is from a collector or arterial <br />street, then this requirement is nat applicable. <br />Conclusion <br />The City Council finds that, based on the above findings, the residential code amendments <br />are consistent with adopted plans, policies, and standards. _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.