Laserfiche WebLink
The motion to amend passed unanimously, 8:G. <br />Mr. Torrey maned, seconded by Mr. Farr, to amend the motion by <br />adding anew #~ hand reordering the others} reading "first moneys <br />would be used to construct a path from Owosso to Green Acres. <br />Mr. Torrey said it was apparent that the community wanted to proceed with <br />completion of the bikepath. He explained that the Route Selection Principles <br />in the Bikeways Master Plan called far locating routes which "provide service <br />and safety to bicyclists destined to schools, major recreational sites, hubs <br />of high activity such,as University of Oregon, downtown Eugene, and valley <br />River Center." He said that the 5,200 people that live in the subject area <br />have to ride 3.l miles to get to the Owosso bike bridge, on a route which he <br />believed was dangerous. He said it was reasonable to take the path north <br />first and acquire the balance of the right-of-way easements second; and if the <br />caunci 1 chooses not to acquire the easements with the remaining funds, he <br />suggested taking the route from the Greenway Bridge north and tying it in to <br />the pond, then out to Goodpasture Island Road. <br />Mr. Boles was unsupportive of the amendment, saying it overly constrained <br />staff in developing a sequence and the body had just voted to hold to the <br />current alignment. <br />Ms. Keller was also unsupportive. <br />Mr. Farr said the section of the bikepath in question, in his opinion would be <br />the most attractive. He added that he hoped the council would consider <br />extending the bikeway system out to his ward eventually. <br />Ms. Nathanson said it was a question of equity and given the indication from <br />staff that the entire bikepath would be complete within four years, she <br />supported the amendr~ent. <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said she opposed the amendment in recognition that staff <br />needed as much latitude as possi b7 a to complete the project. <br />The motion to amend failed, 6:2; with Ms. Nathanson and Mr. Torrey <br />voting in favor. <br />Mr. Bales called for the question. The motion to vote immediately <br />passed, 6:2; with Mr. Hvrnbuckle and Ms. Nathanson opposed. <br />The main motion passed unanimously, as amended, 5:0. <br />Mr. Torrey indicated he voted i n favor to 1 save open the pass i bi 1 i ty of voting <br />to reconsider at the next meeting. <br />The council interrupted further discussion on this item to accommodate <br />visiting legislators. <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 12, I995 Page 5 <br />11:3o a.m. <br />9~ <br />