|
3. Adopted neighborhood refinement and community plans~_ ~'~-~-~,,v,-.o t ..... ~ -, :- r~,.._,~,~_,v,,~, I .,~c*~-,,,
<br />
<br />4. Adopted special pu~ose ~d ~nctional plans~w~-,,,v,~or ..... ~ :~ ~'~'~-~w~- I ~c,~ m~
<br />
<br />5. Info~ation generated t~ou~ preparation of working papers (1978 and 1981) used in
<br /> the update process. Those papers ~e on file in the plying dep~ments of Eugene,
<br /> Springfield, ~d Lane County, as well as the Lane Council of Gove~ents (LCOG).
<br /> Their most si~ificant provisions ~e contained in the Technical Supplement of the Metro
<br /> Plan, phnted ~d available under separate cover. Subjects examined include public
<br /> se~ices and facilities; enviromental assets ~d constraints, including a~culmral l~d,
<br /> the economy, housing, and residential l~d use, and ener~, all in te~s of existing
<br /> conditions ~d projected demand.
<br />
<br />Land Use Designations
<br />
<br />Land use designations shown ion the Metro Plan Diagram are depicted at a metropolitan scale.
<br />Used with the text and local plans and policies, they provide direction for decisions pertaining to
<br />appropriate reuse (redevelopment), urbanization of vacant parcels, and additional use of
<br />underdeveloped parcels. Since its initial adoption in 1982, the Metro Plan Dia~am desi.gnations
<br />have been transitioning to a parcel-specific dia~am. As part of this transition, the boundaries of
<br />Plan desi.gnation areas in the metropolitan UGB are determined on a case-by-case basis, where
<br />........no varcel-snecific desienation has been adorned. ~c) ,,~ --,~^' ............................ zomng
<br />
<br /> ,, ....... ,,, ........ ,c ertan an uses are not in v ua o
<br />metropolitan-wide significance in terms of size or location because of their _s_pecial nature or
<br />limited extent. Therefore, it is not advisable to account for most of them on the Metro Plan
<br />Diagram. The Dia.m'am's depiction of land use designations is not intended to invalidate local
<br />_z_o_n_ ing or land uses which are not sufficiently ~._n...t_._e_n_sj_ve or l_arge e_n_o__u. ~e.h to be included on the
<br />Metro Plan Diagr_am~
<br />
<br />The Plan designation of parcels in the Metro Plan Dia~am is parcel-specific in the followin~
<br />cases:
<br />
<br /> 1 Parcels shown on the Metro Plan Dia~am within a clearly identified Plan
<br /> designation, i.e., parcels that do not border more than one Plan desi..enation;
<br /> 2. ~ L~a_nds~_o...u_[s_(d..~_t_.h..e__.[J__G_B w!_t_hi_.n_ the Metr~o__plan
<br /> 3 Parcels withg_ar_c_el-specificdesi.gnations adopted through__th~c_i~ti__z_e_n=in_itiated
<br /> Plan amendment process;
<br /> 4 Parcels shown on a parcel-specific refinement plan map that has been adopted as
<br /> an amendment to the Metro Plan Dia~am.
<br />
<br />There is a need for continued evaluation and evolution to a parcel-specific dia.gram? The Metro
<br />Plan desi.gnation descriptions below, Metro Plan policies, adopted buildable lands inventory.
<br />
<br /> II-G-2
<br />
<br />
<br />
|