Laserfiche WebLink
a fair analysis of the complications of a Coburg Road route. She indicated that a major factor in the initial <br />selection of Coburg Road was that it linked the first two corridors to create a full cycle BRT system. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling acknowledged a number of stakeholder group members who were in the audience and <br />described the year-long process through which the group had gone. He said the process was challenging <br />and there were a number of areas of disagreement. In particular, he said, the group discussed the physical <br />constriction of the lower part of Coburg Road and the City's requirements for redevelopment setbacks, <br />which would create major impacts on businesses in order to accommodate BRT. He said another concern <br />was the impact on left-turn access to both commercial properties and neighborhoods. He expressed some <br />disappointment that the group did not make a recommendation on the Coburg Road route or an alternative <br />route. He said there was also some discussion of BRT "lite" on the lower end of Coburg Road that would <br />not require a dedicated lane, but acknowledged that the council supported BRT that would have a <br />dedicated lane for a majority of the route. <br /> <br />Ms. Hocken stated that LTD's long-range financial plan matched resources to the timeframe during which <br />they would be spent. She said LTD received both capital funds that required a local match and earmarked <br />funds, and it was earmarked funds that would be used for the Franklin Corridor. She said that earmarked <br />funds were requested for the Pioneer Parkway Corridor as well. She indicated that it was unlikely funds <br />would also be provided for the Coburg Road Corridor and even if they were, accumulating the local match <br />was unrealistic. She said the next funding opportunity would occur in six years and therefore construction <br />was not contemplated until 2010, with the route in service in 2012. <br /> <br />Ms. Wylie said construction of the Springfield Station was well underway and the shape and form of the <br />facility were very visible. She commented that the station would be a beautiful addition to the system and <br />a reminder of the Phase I BRT connection between downtown Eugene and downtown Springfield. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 said it was his understanding that the BRT pilot corridor on Franklin Boulevard would go into <br />service and be evaluated during a test period before any additional corridors were considered, but it now <br />appeared that Phase II was moving forward. Ms. Hocken agreed that Mr. Pap6's perception was correct, <br />and said the reason LTD had moved forward in Springfield was because of the opportunity presented by <br />the Pioneer Parkway extension and road construction and the Springfield City Council's interest in having <br />BRT be a part of the new construction and planning for the PeaceHealth facility. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked if the Springfield corridor could stand alone. Ms. Hocken replied that it would work <br />better with the Eugene loop, but it could work by itself so delaying the next corridor was not an impedi- <br />ment to moving forward with the Springfield corridor. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 asked if funding was available for the pilot corridor and if the BRT vehicles were a reality. Ms. <br />Hocken replied that the pilot corridor funding was in place and that New Flyer, the BRT vehicle <br />manufacturer, had a hybrid vehicle similar to the BRT vehicle design that was in operation in the Seattle <br />transit system. She said the new design aspects of LTD's BRT vehicle were the left-side doors, a larger <br />size, and a guidance system. She said the 60-foot standard articulated buses recently purchased by LTD <br />were similar in feel to the BRT vehicle. Mr. Hamm added that New Flyer produced the standard <br />articulated buses and also produced hybrid electric-powered vehicles and test results were so good that <br />Seattle had just ordered 200 of the vehicles. He said the guidance system was still being tested at the <br />University of California-Berkeley and would probably not be available when the BRT vehicles went into <br />service, but could be added later. He said he was confident the vehicles would be ready on schedule, with <br />a prototype available in mid-2005; however, LTD's fallback position could be use of the regular <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 23, 2004 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />