Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Seeing no one who wished to speak to the issue, Mayor Torrey closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Pap6, Assistant City Manager Jim Carlson explained that the <br />properties could not be included on the tax rolls of the City until the City Council had taken action to <br />withdraw them from the districts. He said, with council approval, the properties would be taxed for the <br />City as of April 1, 2004, but without council approval, the properties would be taxed by both the special <br />districts and the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey asked if there was any council objection to taking action. Seeing none, he called for a <br />motion. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved that the City council <br /> adopt Council Bill 4868, an ordinance providing for withdrawal of territories from <br /> special districts. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> 5. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Adopting Hazardous Substance User Fees for the <br /> Fiscal Year Commencing July 1, 2004 <br /> <br />Mr. Taylor said Glen Potter, Fire and Emergency Medical Services staff to the Toxics Board, would <br />outline the recommendations regarding the fees that were subject to the hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Potter stated that the Toxics Board was, for the first time, forced by legislative action to implement a <br />State fee cap of $2,000 per year per facility for the fees. He reiterated, as explained in the council <br />packet, that the cap inevitably had the effect of substantially reducing fees for larger employees and <br />substantially increasing fees for smaller employees in order to maintain the stability of the program. He <br />explained this was the foundation for the recommendation that the fees be increased to $31.65 per full <br />time equivalent (FTE), up to the State maximum of $2,000. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />John Jordan-Cascade, 1575 Larkspur Loop, stated that he had resided in the City of Eugene since 1978. <br />He alleged that the City had let narrow business interests "run roughshod over the public interests." He <br />stressed that the Toxics Right-to-Know Law was passed in 1996 by a majority of the voters despite the <br />best attempts by business interests to dissuade them. He affirmed the public's fundamental right to know <br />the identity and amounts of toxic chemicals released into workplaces, air, water, soil, and environment of <br />the community as mandated by this law, calling the law innovative and unique. He asserted the law had <br />been successful in serving the interests of Eugeneans and that it was the first and best right-to-know law <br />in the nation. He opposed holding another ballot on the law, calling it an unnecessary financial burden <br />on the public. <br /> <br />Mr. Jordan-Cascade alleged that councilors Nathanson and Meisner had received a rating of ten percent <br />on their votes on conservation issues from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters. He exhorted the <br />council to let the record show by their votes whether they were on the side of public health. <br /> <br />Ruth Wilday, 3120 Coraly Avenue, noted that she resided in a heavily industrialized area. She lauded <br />the Toxics Right-to-Know website, calling it an "amazing" resource. She felt the Toxics Right-To-Know <br />law was a wonderful law. She recommended basing fees on a straight her eanit~ nr per gallon amount. <br /> <br /> Fe~oixia-ry 23 7~004' Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />