Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Solomon said she had recently received several constituent contacts that the City Manager helped her <br />dispose of satisfactorily. She found that exciting as it gave residents a good feeling about the City. <br />Planning and Police staff had been very receptive. <br /> <br /> City Manager Taylor reminded the council of the joint elected officials meeting at the Library the <br /> following day. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner reported that neighbors in the vicinity of 5th Avenue and Lawrence Street recently learned <br />that a residential facility for sex offenders was planned in the area. Neighbors were very concerned. Staff <br />had indicated to him it was a legal use and nothing could be done. He asked how the council's siting <br />policies and good neighbor agreement applied in this situation, noting that neighbors were told nothing <br />about the project. He understood neighbors were to be notified. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey endorsed Mr. Meisner's comments, saying it was not fair to expect one area of the city to <br />have responsibility for housing social services. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey expressed interest in monitoring the State budget picture between now and the special <br />session in June 2004. He said the tax reform committee that had been established would be meeting <br />before that time, and the co-chair had indicated it was highly unlikely the outcome of that process would <br />be actual tax reform. He suggested the council assume that it would live with the budget that it had. It <br />would have to prioritize expenditures as it did not have the dollars to pay for everything that everyone <br />wanted. He anticipated the State legislature would be pressed to go after the revenues the State shared <br />with the cities. <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: Continued Discussion on Priorities for the Planning Division Work <br /> Program <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced Planning and Development Director Tom Coyle and Planning Director <br />Susan Muir, who were present to continue a discussion on the Planning Division's work plan which <br />commenced on December 1, 2003. Mr. Coyle said that the materials before the council had been revised <br />for clarity. He said staff recommended the following as top priorities: 1) the nodal program; 2) minor <br />amendments to the Land Use Code; 3) courthouse and downtown projects; 4) Goal 5 products; and 5) <br />emerging issues. He invited questions and comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ noted his interest in code changes related to the siting of medical clinics. Ms. Muir noted that <br />the item was Item 42 in the list of priorities. Mr. Pap~ indicated his interest in raising the item higher in <br />priority. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor expressed interest in having a higher priority assigned to work on the tree ordinance. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved to affirm the Planning Di- <br /> vision Work Program in Attachment A. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for discussion regarding and amendments to the motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor thought cell towers were also an urgent issue that needed to be addressed because they were <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 9, 2004 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />