Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Proposed Minor Code fixes <br />(As authorized by the Planning Commission) <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br /> <br />CD <br /> <br />9.0500 <br />o <br /> <br />9.0500 <br />@ <br /> <br />9.0500 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.0500 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.0500 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.0500 <br /> <br />(j) <br /> <br />9.2160 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.2161(1) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />Table 9.2170 <br />9.217 1 (5)(c) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />Definition of "canopy tree" <br />does not allow any coniferous <br />trees <br /> <br />Definition of curved lot <br /> <br />Definition of "Development <br />site" <br /> <br />Duplex definition: Attachment <br />requirements <br /> <br />"Legal lot" and "Lot of record" <br />definition regarding lots not <br />created through a plat <br /> <br />"Lot width" definition <br /> <br />"Vision clearance area" <br />definition regarding dimensions <br /> <br />CUP required for R V sales in <br />C-2 zone <br /> <br />C-l limitation of 5,000 square <br />feet of floor area per tenant as it <br />relates to existing buildings <br /> <br />Percent ofbuilding fayade <br />required within 15' maximum <br />setback for GO zone <br /> <br />Projects are prohibited from <br />utilizing coniferous trees in <br />order to meet the canopy trees <br />requirements <br />"Curved lots" are listed in Lot <br />Standards Table (Ee 92760), <br />but the term is not defined <br />Definition restricts ability to <br />comprehensively evaluate a <br />project when streets bisect a site <br />Code requires a duplex to be <br />one building, but does not <br />specify how the two units must <br />be attached <br />Requires recording of deeds <br />prior to April 2, 1962. In some <br />cases, the deeds may be signed <br />but not recorded by this date <br />Definition does not apply well <br />to non-rectangular shaped lots. <br />Creates confusion in evaluation <br />of subdivisions/partitions <br />The definition explains how to <br />determine the vision clearance <br />triangle but doesn't denote that <br />the legs are 35 feet long <br />CUP requirement excessive <br />compared to other similar uses <br />which are permitted outright <br />(i.e. auto and motorcycle sales, <br />auto repair, service stations) <br />Code is unclear if 5,000 sq. ft. <br />limitation applies to new <br />tenants in existing buildings <br />which already exceed 5,000 sq <br />ft. <br />GO zone does not specify the <br />minimum percentage of <br />building facade that is required <br />within the 15' maximum <br />setback, as is specified in other <br />zones <br /> <br />Enable a wider range of canopy <br />trees available by allowing <br />some coniferous trees <br /> <br />Provide definition of curved lot <br /> <br />Clarify definition so that a <br />developmerlt site can include <br />arcels se arated b a street <br />Clarify minimum requirements <br />for how units must be attached, <br />consistent with current <br />interpretati ons <br />Change definition to be based <br />on date that the deeds are <br />signed <br /> <br />Revise definition to erlsure that <br />lots, regardless of shape, have <br />adequate buildable area <br /> <br />Include the dimension of 35 <br />feet in the definition to coincide <br />with the figure <br /> <br />Allow RV sales in C-2 zone as <br />a permitted use <br /> <br />Clarify that the limitation only <br />applies to new buildings in C-1, <br />so as to enable tenant reuse of <br />existing building <br /> <br />Clarify the minimum percent of <br />building frontage that must be <br />located within the maximum <br />setback <br /> <br />n <br />