My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Ordinance on Chambers Special Area Zone
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 10/12/05 WS
>
Item A: Ordinance on Chambers Special Area Zone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:20 PM
Creation date
10/3/2005 4:09:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />enclave of houses were prescribed, and were not significant in terms of the overall city goals. He stated <br />that staff followed the direction of the Planning Commission to work with CAFHN to incorporate their <br />recommendations into the final draft ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe said staff concurred with Mr. Belcher's assertion that a discussion about density needed to <br />occur. However, staff did not recommend that the Chambers Reconsidered plan be put on the shelf until <br />the issues were resolved, as those discussions would be significant and.have tmplications far beyond the <br />,<~~;;;:;;;:~;:::;:~;~ .';~;:;:;;;, -:;;;;;;: <br />Chambers Reconsidered plan. .........::..'. ............. <br /> <br />, ',>.;..:.' ";":":":<'~';""""'.'~ <br />,",>.y ',.:",;,,:,;,~, ',',' " <br /> <br />""""",','.',',,<',', <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless said it was important to look at this process as a ser~\~~:g~f~~meal i:~d@~i:~~gg~,;i~nsity <br />and neighborhood structure, transportation, and preservation of e~i~m~~~:;~;:ighbOrho~:;:g::WRis process <br />helped clarity what other work needs to be done. He stated the infiH statia~!t@~~ thi~:~eighborhood <br />were well crafted and needed to be considered a setting He agreed tfil~:j~~$1in experiment, and <br />much else remained to be done. <br /> <br />Gro'\\1h <br /> <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Hledik, <br />said that the residential study indicated <br />high as 28 units per acre. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe and Mr. Conte, <br />12 units per acre, and could go as <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher the density goal set under the <br />if incremental changes continued to occur. <br /> <br />VIew <br /> <br />that he could support, with the exception of protection of the <br />plan move forward in tandem the implementation of another <br />study that provided for increasing density through opportunity <br /> <br />code that created an <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe asked if Mr. Belcher's proposal meant bringing back the 1998 version of the Chan1bers Plan or <br />something like it where opportunity siting, as it was now called, was used to identify those areas in which <br />additional development densities could occur, as a starting point for a discussion. He added, in the study, <br />there were areas identified as those areas that would receive additional density. <br /> <br />MINUTES --- Eugene Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />September 26, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.