My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Ordinance on Chambers Special Area Zone
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 10/12/05 WS
>
Item A: Ordinance on Chambers Special Area Zone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:20 PM
Creation date
10/3/2005 4:09:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/12/2005
No existen anotaciones en esta página.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Such built~in flexibility in the code that could be beneficial was missing from the current plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe stated that lot aggregation and partitions, how lots were created, was fundamental part of <br />CAFIIN's issue base. Aggregation was a staff concern. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless understood a good portion of the concept was to preserve internal areas and the perimeter of <br /> <br />the CAFHN area. He had no problem keeping the fine grain of the <br />existed. <br /> <br />sited lot aggregation as an example. <br /> <br />/h'h' <br />....................................,'.... <br /> <br /> <br />and scale as it <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter said the ordinance treated density and the physical <br />leaving opportunities to add some limited density, i.e., no more <br />fell within the structures and lot lines that fit the old pattern. <br /> <br />they <br /> <br />Mr. Nystrom said some nagging issues remained, <br />regarding what the Planning Commission would <br /> <br />to the City Council <br />through the experiment. He <br /> <br />,::::::':::::::::';::::::. <br />Mr. Duncan stated it woul.~th!l:ye been:hetl'~~~?! him if how plan fit with the GMS policy would <br />have been eXPla~~~~;:~~:::~~~i~l~i:i~ii:~~~~t:~e of::fi~~~~~h~~p.osal fit within all 19 of the policies. This type <br />of documenta:~~gnwould provide:~IR:::~9.~. P1annin~W:ofumission and the City Council a better feel of how <br />..... . c,. ,........ <br />'-"bY.- ..:.~.:,,;.:":",.;.:,...:v, ...... <br />this fit in19i.me big picture. He added)~~! although it may be necessary to reexamine these actions in five <br />'.'h'''''".'.Y''''"''''' .,..:......;.......,. <br /> <br />or te!fye~~~i~~:.~ay never come ba~~f:Although everyone wanted to revisit refinement plans ten years <br />ago, the Chaili~!~:::~~~onsidered proi~~f has served somewhat as a refinement plan for this area. <br /> <br />Mr. Lowe stated that rt:f!~~~'t::'Plan review was part of the department's on-going work program issues, <br />and returning to establish~~f;plans went to availability of resources. <br /> <br />Mr. Nystrom said this process would be looked back upon as an experiment, to consider what worked <br />and what did not work. <br /> <br />Ms. Muir said that the state transportation plan had reporting requirements whereby the City of Eugene <br />had to report its accomplishments under this program to the State of Oregon. She added the most recent <br /> <br />MINUTES - Eugene Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />September 26,2005 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.