Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The referenced Figure 2 of the C-1 findings is entitled Landuse Compatibility, Rural <br />Impacts and shows the land uses in the vicinity of the Modified Alignment, specifying <br />the type of agricultural use (hay, sheep, cattle) for those sites where agricultural uses are <br />in place. The Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("SDEIS") for the <br />Modified Alignment was cited heavily throughout the findings. The SDEIS contains two <br />maps at figure 3-3, page 1 of2, and figure 3-4 page 1 of2. Figure 3-3 shows Existing <br />Land Use along the Modified Alignment. Figure 3-4 of the SDEIS shows the <br />comprehensive plan designations adjacent to the Modified Alignment. As shown in <br />Figure 3-4 and described in the adopted findings, there is land adjacent to the Modified <br />Alignment designated as Agriculture. Though the existing uses along the proposed <br />parkway vary widely, the findings note that the great majority of the land bordering the <br />northern side of the Modified Alignment is in parks/open space and is managed as part of <br />the West Eugene Wetlands Plan. <br /> <br />In addition, pages 47-49 of the C-1 findings are dedicated specifically to the requirement <br />of Goal 2, Part lI(c)(4). The discussion in this section of the findings largely summarizes <br />the Compatibility Memorandum that was also adopted by the local governments (as <br />Exhibit C-3) and incorporated into the C-1 findings. The C-1 findings on pages 47-49 <br />explain the reduction of impacts on farm uses that will result from the Modified <br />Alignment. They also explain the Modified Alignment's effect on access to rural <br />properties and the ways in which access is designed to "limit local access to the adjoining <br />rural area, thereby reducing adverse farm impacts and maintaining compatibility." C-1, <br />page 47. The findings then explain in detail how the ownership interests and zoning of <br />the areas adjacent to the Modified Alignment will assist in ensuring limited access to <br />adj acent agricultural areas. C-1, page 48-49. <br /> <br />The findings adopted as Exhibit C-3 and incorporated into the C-! findings are those <br />referred to above as ODOT's Compatibility Memorandum. This ten-page memorandum <br />identifies each tax lot that is adjacent to the Modified Alignment and provides a detailed <br />description of those properties and their uses. The memo contains an analysis of the six <br />major ways that a roadway project can impact land uses in rural areas and concludes, <br />with some detail, that "[t]he WEP would not have any major impacts on land uses in the <br />project area. In general, it is compatible with adjacent uses." C-3, page 10.1 Based on <br />that analysis and the additional adopted findings as described above, the local <br />government concluded the actions complied with applicable standards for exceptions to <br />Statewide Goals, including the requirements of Goal 2, Part lI( c)( 4). <br /> <br />1 The analysis concentrates on the impacts (or lack thereof) based on the following six categories: l) <br />displacement of houses and buildings; 2) acreage losses from roadway rights-of-way and/or uneconomic <br />remnants; 3) parcelization, resulting in more complicated farming practices; 4) complication of access to <br />properties; 5) visual modifications to the rural setting; and 6) potential induced development. <br /> <br />3 <br />