Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B. WORK SESSION: Initiating Code Amendments for Downtown-Related Zoning <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor recalled that the item was scheduled for a work session after the council removed it <br />from the July 18 Consent Calendar. He introduced Nan Laurence of the Planning and Development <br />Department, who provided the council with a PowerPoint presentation on initiating code amendments for <br />downtown-related zoning regulations. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence provided some background, explaining that the idea for a new zone for downtown arose from <br />the Downtown Vision and was supported by the Downtown Plan, which was adopted by the council in April <br />2004. Implementing the Downtown Plan was a council priority issue. At the direction of the Planning <br />Commission, staff worked with the Eugene Redevelopment Advisory Committee (ERAC), a council- <br />appointed committee, to identify some issues related to development under the current code. Following a <br />review of that work, the commission expressed consensus that the City needed to reexamine some of the <br />requirements in the code. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence identified two goals for the project: 1) to align the Land Use Code with Growth Management <br />Policies and the policies in the Downtown Plan; and 2) to support, encourage, and reinforce a vibrant, <br />active, densely developed downtown. The City's overall goal was to develop zoning regulations that allowed <br />an intensity and density of uses downtown and helped to implement the Downtown Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence said the commission found there were gaps and overlaps in the regulations as well as <br />conflicts. The commission agreed the code needed to be more consistent and effective in implementing the <br />Downtown Plan. Downtown was at a competitive disadvantage to parts of the community in regard to costs <br />and existing regulations increased that cost. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence shared maps of the existing downtown zones with the council to illustrate the complexity of <br />the various zones and overlays. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence emphasized that the commission communicated to staff the message that flexibility was key to <br />successful facilitation of creative projects. The commission was looking to create a balance in implementing <br />the council's direction as expressed in the Land Use Code adopted in 2002, and the Downtown Plan, <br />adopted in 2004. The commission believed there were areas of the code that could be improved. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence shared a preliminary list of issues that the commission believed warranted further examina- <br />tion, suggesting that the council and public would likely add more items to the list. The list included: 1) <br />transit-oriented development (TOD) overlay; 2) requirement for nonresidential uses on the ground floor; 3) <br />limitation on surface parking; and 4) bicycle parking. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence elaborated on each issue, beginning with the TOD overlay. She said the overlay included a <br />density requirement, or Floor Area Ratio (FAR) that may not be producing the desired results, and staff <br />wished to take a closer look at that. Another concern in regard to the TOD overlay was its boundaries, <br />which did not include all of downtown and extended outside downtown. <br /> <br />Speaking to the issue of the FAR, Ms. Laurence shared two examples of development that represented the <br />same amount of density; one example covered the entire development site with a one-floor building, while <br />the second example showed a two-story structure occupying half the development site. <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br /> <br />September 12, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />