Laserfiche WebLink
<br />However. the first recommendation to the Eugene Planning Commission referred to the property <br />within the Eugene Urban Growth Boundary, only, and this ordinance refers to the Metro area <br />buildable lands inventory for residential properties. This change in available buildable inventory <br />now includes Springfield city buildable inventory for residential development. This looks to be a <br />very definite effort to inflate numbers for buildable lands inventory for Eugene but, not actually <br />included or existing in Eugene. This may very well be legal but it is most certainly <br />disingenuous. <br /> <br />Furthermore, this change in reference adds to the contention that Eugene is very close to being <br />out of buildable lands inventory for residential development. The city of Eugene, for the <br />purposes of the Natural Resources Study, used the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area <br />Residential Lands and Housing Study (RLHS), 1999, to determine the buildable lands inventory. <br />This information is certainly more current than the original 1992 inventory data provided at the <br />beginning of the periodic review process. But, the 1999 data is now 6 years old, and this change <br />in reference provides Eugene the opportunity to side-step their responsibility to do their part to <br />provide a 20 year buildable lands inventory for residential development. It also helps push the <br />demand to all the outlying communities who are developing residential properties at a very fast <br />pace, which is placing a tremendous burden on the transportation infrastructure connected with <br />Eugene. Furthermore, the structures being built in the smaller communities are for the most part <br />being placed on larger lots which, in turn, defeats the city planners efforts to create denser <br />communities. <br /> <br />EAR' contention that Goal 1 0 has not been adequately addressed in the overall periodic review <br />process is based on the fact that there is no current needed housing inventory data to support the <br />finished product. If the city has not continued a process to provide current needed housing data, <br />as required by state statute, then the periodic review process, for Eugene, is flawed. It is EAR' <br />contention this needs to be rectified before the two ordinances are approved and the final <br />periodic review process is finished. <br /> <br />Contacts: Shawn Hittenberger, President <br />Eugene Association of REAL TORS@ <br />2139 Centennial Plaza <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />541-484-3043 <br /> <br />Jim Welsh, Political Advocate <br />Eugene Association of REAL TORS@ <br />541-484-3043 Office <br />541-554-8043 Cell <br />idwelshco@msn.com <br />