Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Letter to Eugene City Council <br />September 26, 2005 <br />Page 2 of2 <br /> <br />The Scale of Map 21 A and 21 B appears to be approximately 1" = 1200 feet. This scale makes it <br />difficult to determine how far into the subject properties the IWR overlay will reach. However, it <br />appears that only tax lots 1100 and 1500 would be touched by the setback. Rezoning tax lot 1200 is <br />unjustifiable. <br /> <br />2. Inclusion and regulation of tax lots 1100, 1200 and 1500 is uniustifiable because even if the <br />wetland setback reaches into the subiect properties, the area of the setback is "developed" within <br />the meaning of proposed regulation EC 9.4920(5) and (6). <br /> <br />EC 9.4920(5) states, <br /> <br />"Areas which the applicant has shown to have been developed prior to [date of adoption} are <br />excludedfrom /WR conservation areas. For purposes of this subsection, "developed" means within <br />the footprint of a legally constructed structure that is a: (a) building, or other substantial structure <br />constructed on a concrete foundation; (b) permanent dwelling *** constructed without a concrete <br />foundation; (c) permanent deck or patio ***; (d) paved or gravel parking area, road, or driveway <br />that serves uses in an adjacent building or structure ***. " <br /> <br />Except for required yard setbacks, tax lots 1100, 1200 and 1500 are developed in their entirety with <br />buildings, structures and associated paved parking. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />){/~ <br /> <br />Kimberly l.R. O'Dea <br /> <br />Cc: Client <br />