Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Eu~ene Natural Resources <br /> <br />From: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />on behalf of Eugene Natural Resources <br />RE: Public Hearing Testimony Goal 5 Natural Resources Study <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: charles biggs [mailto:charles_biggs@hotmail.com] <br />Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:29 PM <br />To: *Eugene Mayor and City Council <br />Cc: BJORKLUND Neil H <br />Subject: Public Hearing Testimony Goal 5 Natural Resources Study <br /> <br />SEP 2 6 2005 <br /> <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Hearing Testimony: <br />Public Hearing September 26, 2005 <br />Agenda item 3 Goal 5 Natural Resources Study <br /> <br />Dear Mayor and City Councilors, <br /> <br />I am concerned that the State Goal 5 (Natural Resources) for Eugene's upland <br />inventory is inadequate because it does not protect the upland areas which <br />do not contain water bodies, but does in fact contain valuable habitat(s) <br />(Oregon White Oak) and (State: OAR 496.012, and 635-100-100 to 635-100-130, <br />and OAR 635-100-040) sensitive animal specie(s) (Western Gray Squirrel). <br />While there is a stated plan to address this inadequately in the limited <br />area of the South Hill Study boundary area those areas which fall outside of <br />this area, are left unprotected. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Charles Biggs <br />540 Antelope Way, <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br /> <br />C.C. Neil Bjorklund <br /> <br />1 <br />