Laserfiche WebLink
<br />could not attend the proposed interview date. He asked for council consent to direct staff to work with the <br />candidates to find interview dates that worked. Councilors nodded in assent. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said the Oregon State Legislature passed a bill allowing Oregon cities to make application to the <br />Federal Forest Legacy Program for forest acquisitions with the urban growth boundary and asked if staff <br />was seeking opportunities to take advantage of that funding. He also asked if the council had any role in <br />that process. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly reported that the Region 2050 long-range planning project sponsored a very well-attended <br />meeting at the Lane County Fairgrounds on September 22. About 90 to 100 participants engaged in high- <br />quality discussions about the future of the community. Mr. Kelly said the meeting was the last of a dozen <br />public meetings in the region. The Region 2050 Policy Board would review the information collected <br />through the public process and prepare a draft strategy for review by all participating jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she recently spoke at the Lane County Historic Museum in conjunction with an exhibit <br />about public safety in Lane County. The museum was sponsoring a series of speakers through the month <br />of November. She said the exhibit was very interesting and she encouraged councilors and residents to <br />visit it if possible. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman announced that Lane County Commissioner Peter Sorenson would hold a public forum at the <br />Lane County Fairgrounds on September 27 for the purpose of hearing from residents how they felt about <br />the future of the fairgrounds. She would also be at the forum. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor commended the Region 2050 planning process, saying he was impressed by the depth of the <br />community input being sought. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said the Board of the Lane Metro Partnership met the previous week to discuss the organiza- <br />tional evaluation. The evaluation indicated four areas for improvement: I) a more effective marketing <br />outreach program; 2) continued improvement of the partner relationships; 3) adoption of a work plan with <br />specific goals and measurable outcomes; and 4) better engagement of the expertise represented on the <br />board. He described the board's discussion as very good, and said he had been encouraged by its <br />direction. He noted the State suffered from a general shortage of "shovel-ready" land, and he character- <br />ized that as both a problem and an opportunity. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said the Human Services Commission (HSC) met earlier that day and he thought the discussion, <br />which was focused around goal-setting and strategizing, was very productive. The commission also <br />discussed its role and how it could be more effective as a policy making body. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said it appeared that several councilors would miss the October 11 meeting related to the <br />Coburg wastewater treatment proposal. He anticipated an interesting discussion. <br /> <br />With regard to the HSC meeting, Ms. Ortiz agreed with Mr. Pryor that the commission had a good <br />conversation. She observed that as a new councilor she frequently found herself in the role of "new <br />person," but she was not as "new" as many people thought, so it was interesting to see people's percep- <br />tions. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz reported the Trainsong neighbors held their neighborhood picnic on September 21. About 75 <br />people attended, and many people signed up for additional participation in neighborhood issues. She said <br />that school supplies were given away to children. Ms. Ortiz hoped to see more citizens participate in the <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br /> <br />September 26, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />