My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 12/08/08 Meeting
>
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:08:01 PM
Creation date
12/5/2008 9:53:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
“basically destroyed” in the community. He thanked the Mayor and the council for trying to work things out <br />in the latest dispute so that it followed the charter amendment. <br /> <br />Paul Prensky <br />, 1270 Jacobs Drive, said he had asked City Manager Jon Ruiz when he would give the <br />auditor full backing. He wanted Mr. Ruiz to speak out. He had gotten to know the current Police Auditor, <br />Dawn Reynolds, and had found her to be “regardful and fair-minded.” He called her an “ardent student of <br />the rights of the homeless.” He felt she was providing a resource the community really needed. He shared <br />his suggestion that Joseph McNamara, PhD., from Stanford University be brought to Eugene to help the <br />situation between the citizens and the police. He averred that everyone needed to sit at the table and talk and <br />listen “regardfully” and they would arrive at agreements. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff <br />, somewhere on Patterson Street, averred that transparency was “not a brand,” and Mr. <br />Ruiz should “do it” and not just talk about it. He had read that Councilor Zelenka had supported more <br />accountability for the police. He opined that Councilor Zelenka had a lack of accountability on “certain <br />very massive projects.” He asserted that the City Manager had been meeting behind closed doors about a <br />“huge project” that Mr. Vishanoff felt he was not allowed to talk about. He wanted to know when the <br />minutes from those meetings would be available. He said if there was a draft memorandum of understand- <br />ing, he wanted to know when he could see it. He alleged that there was a plan called the “Farkas Report” <br />and it was now missing. He wanted to know where it was and he wanted a copy of it. He also wondered <br />how soon “form-based codes” would be instituted. <br /> <br />Ruth Duemler <br />, 1745 Fircrest Drive, thanked everyone for their support for the Police Auditor. She felt <br />there should be a transparent system, given that the people had voted for it. She supported having an <br />executive session and supported having a performance auditor akin to that in Portland. She asserted that the <br />performance auditor had been very successful and had made a big difference to the police department there. <br />She thanked the councilors who had supported Ballot Measure 20-146. She averred that it would help to <br />develop more trust with the police department. <br /> <br />John “Mac” McFadden <br />, 575 Knapp Lane, stated that ten years earlier he had been hired as the liaison for <br />the St. Vincent DePaul car campers. He said in the first couple of weeks of the job he took inventory by <br />driving around at night and finding out who was out there and what their needs were. He related that he had <br />seen a police car on one of those trips and was certain he would be stopped by the officer so he pulled over. <br />He had done so because he believed that in order to do his job he needed to be able to trust the police and <br />they needed to be able to trust him. He declared that this was how to build trust – with openness and <br />transparency and a willingness to answer their questions and not secretiveness or withholding information. <br /> <br />Jim Torrey <br />, Ward 4, respectfully requested that the Mayor and City Council ask legal counsel and <br />members of the planning and transportation departments to review the decision made on August 13 <br />regarding the removal of the term West Eugene Parkway (WEP) from the Transportation Plan (TransPlan). <br />He explained that Goal 12 stated that there must be a replacement before removing a program that would <br />remove congestion from West Eugene. He underscored the need to seriously look at the implications of this <br />decision with regard to the ability to develop property in West Eugene until a replacement for the WEP had <br />been determined. He added that the WEP terminology did not refer to the alignment that had been <br />terminated in 2005, it referred to an arterial that would reduce congestion. He wanted to make sure that the <br />unintended consequences of the efforts in the August 13 decision would not stop the community from being <br />able to develop businesses and other things, such as an urgent care facility in West Eugene. <br /> <br />Paul Moore <br />, 2586 Potter Street, wanted to discuss the plan for the Crest area that had been approved in <br />April, which was a plan for two narrow nine-foot-wide traffic lanes on winding and sometimes steep <br />upgrades in that area. He reiterated that testimony from the bicycling community there had been that it <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 13, 2008 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.