Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pryor preferred to have more frequent and shorter meetings, but agreed that an item could be shifted to <br />a regular meeting agenda if it did not cause that meeting to be too long. He said the third Monday public <br />hearing could be considered optional. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed with granting the City Manager and Mayor the authority to shift an item to a regular <br />meeting agenda, depending on the topic and expected amount of public testimony. <br /> <br />Topic: Use of laptops during City Council meetings <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz said she initially objected to the use of laptops and had heard from constituents that they thought <br />councilors might be paying more attention to their computers than to the meeting discussion. She could now <br />accept their use during meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor agreed with Ms. Ortiz that there could be a perception that a laptop was distracting the user’s <br />attention from the meeting and suggested that the council establish a protocol that laptops be used only as a <br />resource for reviewing the agenda and related materials. He noted that the use of laptops promoted <br />sustainability by eliminating a very large volume of paper. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thought the council should formalize a policy and not rely on the honor system with respect to <br />laptop use. She said the idea that a councilor could be receiving emails from constituents, lobbyists or <br />others viewing the webcast was disturbing and that would constitute inappropriate contact during a council <br />discussion. She said if the council did not want to formalize a policy to allow laptop use, then there should <br />not be any Internet access during the meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said he used his laptop to make meeting notes, organize materials by topic and eliminate paper. <br />He said the electronic filing cabinet provided easy reference to information. He did not feel laptops should <br />be used to communicate during a meeting, but Internet access was important to retrieving materials related <br />to the meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to extend the discussion by five min- <br />utes. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark agreed with Mr. Zelenka that a laptop was a very useful tool and there were times when Internet <br />access was important. He would support a formal policy that laptops were to be used as a meeting resource <br />and outside communication during a meeting should be prohibited. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor commented that councilors could communicate with each other during meetings. She did not <br />want laptops used and preferred to see people’s faces instead of their computers. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted that all email to councilors was part of the public record, but she heard from a <br />constituent who was told that councilors could delete emails and then they were no longer in the public <br />record. Mr. Klein cautioned councilors that email should not be deleted unless it was addressed to the <br />Mayor and council, in which case staff retained a copy. Email sent directly to an individual councilor in his <br />or her official capacity was covered by State retention requirements and should not be deleted. He would <br />provide a retention schedule. <br /> <br /> <br />Topic: Use of council office space (guidelines, courtesies) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 15, 2008 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />