Item 4: Public Hearing on Ordinance on Minor Land Use Code Amendments

Home Browse Search

9.7110 Type I decisions: Limits EC 9.8415 and 9.8715 allow Correct conflicting language by decisions to approval or denials conditional approval of amending EC 9.7110 to allow ~ property line adjustments and for conditional approvals. unimproved easement vacations. This conflicts with language under Type I process, which implies projects can only be approved or denied as is. 9.7605,9.7655 Filing deadlines for appeals Code requires filing of appeals Specify that the deadline within 12 days of notice of expires at 5pm or the close of @ decision but does not specify the regular business day. the time of day for this deadline (e.g. could allow after hours submittals). 9.7805(map), Industrial Corridor Map ICCO map doesn't precisely Revise geographic description 9.78~ match the boundaries in the in 9.7885 and map to match " 1991 Industrial Corridor agreement. Agreement. 9.8010 (table) Reference to adopted plans Many dates listed in table are Eliminate dates from the table includes specific dates for each not reflected on adopted plan or of applicable plans. @ plan. do not correspond to date of adoption. If plans are amended, it would require a code amendment simply to reflect new date. 9.8030(10) Traffic Demand Management Code allows the city to require Establish ability to require (TDM) Plans: Adjustments to an annual report for TDM's annual reports for TDM plans @ parking standards involving a reduction in requesting adjustments to minimum parking, but not for maximum parking TDM's involving excess requirements. parkinj2;. 9.8030(10) Adjustment to parking Requires TDM approval before, Revise language so that a TDM @ standards: Timing and rather than a part of adjustment plan is reviewed as part of requirement for TDM plans review. Requires formal TDM adjustment review. Allow for all requests. Some ability to waive formal TDM adjustment reviews can be plan if required adjustment adequately addressed without a review criteria are otherwise formal TDM. met. 9.8055(1) Cluster Subdivision Criteria Criteria reference redundant. Strike EC 9.8055(1)(c), (d) and @ Lot dimensions, street and (e). public improvement standards already addressed within standard subdivision criteria. 9.8055(1) Cluster Subdivisions: Doesn't include intended range Revise language and review Relaxation of lot and of standards which can be process to provide intended (jj) development standards relaxed (i.e. Setbacks, lot range of standards available for coverage etc). Also requires relaxation while integrating an separate adjustment review exceptions process (same process instead of integrating requirements) into subdivision within the subdivision process. process.