Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />9.6730(4) <br /> <br />9.6745 <br /> <br />9.6810(4) <br /> <br />9.6815 <br /> <br />9.6820 <br /> <br />9.6885 <br /> <br />9.7110 <br /> <br />9.8030 <br /> <br />9.8055 <br /> <br />9.8310 <br /> <br />9.8335 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />which allows adjustment of on-site pedestrian circulation consistent with <br />the criteria of 9.8030(22). <br /> <br />which allows specific intrusions into the setbacks for stories above the <br />ground floor. <br /> <br />which allows for block lengths of greater than 600 feet if the developer <br />demonstrates that the resulting street network will not create excessive <br />travel lengths and will accommodate necessary emergency access. <br /> <br />which provides greater flexibility with regard to street connectivity <br />requirements without sacrificing the goals of street connectivity. <br /> <br />which clarifies the use of cul-de-sacs and provides greater flexibility <br />without sacrificing the goals of street connectivity. <br /> <br />which permits a developer to submit plans by a landscape architect as an <br />alternative to those of a certified arborist. <br /> <br />which allows the planning director to approve an application with <br />conditions. <br /> <br />which improves the conditions for adjustment review. <br /> <br />which facilitates the use of cluster subdivisions. <br /> <br />which eliminates the requirement that the PUD design team include a <br />member of the American Institute of Certified Planners. <br /> <br />which allows a modification of a tentative PUD approval. <br /> <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment on these proposed code amendments. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />/~)(~ ~~ <br /> <br />Roxie Cuellar <br />Director of Government Affairs <br />