Item 4: Public Hearing on Ordinance on Minor Land Use Code Amendments

Home Browse Search

9.2180,9.2470, "Average Lot Width" The term "Average lot width" is Eliminate the word "average" 9.2686,9.3220, requirement for Commercial, mistakenly referenced. Lot from each code section. 9.3822 Industrial, Public Land, width is not measured by an @ Downtown Westside & Royal averaging approach (see 9.0500 Node S ecial Area zones for definition of lot width . 9.2450(table) Land Use Table for Industrial Section 9.5750 specifically Add the "S" symbol to the Land @ Zones related to allows telecommunication Use Table enabling Telecommunication towers and towers in 1-1, but this is not telecommunication towers in facilities reflected on the Use Table (EC the 1-1 zone, subject to special 9.2450 . standards. 9.2450(table) Trucking Terminals allowed in Since 1968 this use has been Clarify that trucking terminals @) 1-2 and 1-3 zones permitted outright in these two are permitted outright in the 1-2 zones, however it is not and 1-3 zones by listing in the specifically listed in the 1-2 and industrial use matrix. 1-3 use tables. 9.2683(2) PL zone requires a Site Review Language is unclear. Could be Clarify language such that the for many uses and a CUP for read to require a Site Review in projects requiring a CUP are @ more significant uses within addition to a CUP. The intent not also subject to Site Review. 300' of residential property was to elevate more intense uses to a more intense public hearin rocess (i.e. CUP . 9.2685(1) Height of buildings within 50' Language is not clear that the Clarify that the special height of a residential zone restricted special height restriction is restriction applies only for that ([j) to height limit of adjacent limited to that portion of a portion of a building within 50' residential zone building within the 50' buffer. of a residential zone. Does not account for buildings with v 'n hei hts. 9.2741 Land Use Table for Residential Rowhouses are allowed in Include reference in the Land @ Zones, related to rowhouses residential zones, subject to Use Table regarding special specific limitations in some limitations listed in EC 9.735. zones. Table does not reference the special limitations listed in EC 9.735 Sitin Re uirements 9.2760 (table) Creation of duplex, triplex & Code not clear this is limited to Modify language consistent 9.2761(6) fourplex lots in new subdivision plats, not partitions. with duplex provisions in subdivisions: Allows limited Also implies that a request to 9.2741(4,5,6). Also, clarify that @ number of multi-family lots in utilize the allowance for a duplex, triplex, fourplex R-l subdivisions duplex, triplex or fourplex in an designation entitles (rather than R -1 subdivision is binding, mandates)owner to develop lot rather than an option, thereby with extra unites) precluding future options to simply build a single family residence instead.