My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - Civic Center Update
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-04/28/04WS
>
Item A - Civic Center Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:56:56 PM
Creation date
4/22/2004 8:44:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/28/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comparison of Borrowing Methods <br /> Is on-going What part of <br /> funding Is' there sufficient the community Are voters likely Is' it important to achieve <br />Borrowing available to room under debt will use/who to approve a hal- the lowest possible bor- Other Factors <br /> limits' to include should pay for lot measure for rowing cost and interest <br />Type make annual project borrowing? the project? rates? <br /> payments'? the project? <br />GO Bonds No Subject to statutory Whole Voter approval First choice - lowest cost This borrowing method comes <br /> limits community required, with with a funding source to make <br /> benefits double majority the annual payments <br /> provisions <br />Limited Tax Yes Subject to policy Whole Voter approval Second choice Statutes limit the purposes avail- <br />Bonds limits if not self- community or not needed able to borrow under this pro- <br /> supporting subset gram <br />COPs or Yes Subject to policy Whole Voter approval Third choice - FF&C lease- <br />Lease- limits if not self- community or not needed purchase <br />Purchase supporting subset COPS - can be very <br /> expensive <br />Revenue Yes Subject to policy User pays Subject to citizen Can range from relatively May be used for projects <br />Bonds limits if not self- referral of inexpensive to very expen- including but not limited to real <br /> supporting ordinance sive, depending on the property construction or <br /> project and revenue source acquisition <br />Assessment Yes Subject to statutory Benefited Creation of More expensive; financing Can only be used for assessment <br />Bonds limits party pays assessment depends on nature of projects <br /> district subject to property assessed <br /> remonstrance <br />Tax Yes Not Applicable (no Whole Voter approval More expensive Can only be used for projects <br />Increment statutory or policy community or not needed included in the UR plan <br />Bonds limit) subset <br />Section 108 Yes Not Applicable Whole Voter approval More expensive Project must be eligible for <br />Loans community or not needed CDBG funding. <br /> subset <br />Conduit Yes Subject to policy Whole Voter approval Very expensive due to com- May be used if there is no statu- <br />Financing limits if not self- community or not needed plicated relationships and tory authority to issue COPs; are <br /> supporting subset additional parties there reasons to give up control <br /> over the project? <br />Lease Pur- Yes Subject to policy Whole Voter approval More expensive than GO May be used if there is no <br />chase with limits if not self- community or not needed bonds, even with conduit statutory authority to issue COPs <br />Private Sector supporting subset financing <br />Participation <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040428\S040428A. doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.