My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - Civic Center Update
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-04/28/04WS
>
Item A - Civic Center Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:56:56 PM
Creation date
4/22/2004 8:44:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/28/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The attached table titled "How to Get the Best Value for Your Construction Dollar" summarizes <br />the advantages and disadvantages of a variety of construction delivery methods, and provides a <br />flow chart of the major project relationships for each type of project. This table was prepared by <br />a consulting firm for use by school districts, but the information is applicable to the City of <br />Eugene. Following this is a matrix that summarizes how each of these project delivery methods <br />relates specifically to the City. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF THE CITY OF EUGENE'S EXPERIENCE <br /> <br />The City of Eugene has had experience with most of the major project delivery methods in recent <br />years. This includes a design/build project for construction of the Pearl Street Garage and the <br />Bethel Skate Park, a construction manager/owner's representative project with the Airport <br />Terminal Expansion project, the Construction Manager/General Contractor method used for the <br />current Roosevelt Police Facility project, and a modification of a traditional design/bid/build <br />project called "Partnering" on the downtown Library. A form of public/private partnership was <br />used on construction of Broadway Place, with each entity responsible for construction of its own <br />part of the development. <br /> <br />The overall lesson from this experience has been that gaining schedule and cost predictability of <br />these different forms of project delivery usually requires a trade-off in the City's control of the <br />quality or functional performance of the project. None of the project delivery methods <br />completely eliminates the City's need for oversight of the project. The experience, skill and <br />commitment of the construction firm become the critical elements in ensuring a good working <br />relationship between the City and the construction firm, and eventual success of the project. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040428\S040428A. doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.