Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment D <br /> Comparison of Project Delivery Methods <br /> <br /> Criteria Project Delivery Method <br /> Design/Bid/Build Partnering Construction Manager Contract Manager as Agent Design/Build Bridging (Modified <br /> (CM/GC) (Multiple Prime Contractors) Design/Build) <br /> <br />Accountability++ Highest accountability ++ Highest accountability + High accountability between - CM acts as owner's agent, so -- Least project control by - Using design consultant <br /> between owner, designer between owner, owner, designer and owner may not be directly owner, as most design to prepare partial design, <br /> and contractor designer and contractor. As CM involved at involved in many design and and construction issuesprior to contracting with ~ <br /> contractor design phase, ability to identify contract issues. As owner are resolved internally by design/build firm, <br /> and resolve design issues contracts with several prime the construction provides more owner <br /> early improves owner's control contractors, coordination contractor input in final product. <br /> of project outcomes, between contractors can However, two separate <br /> create accountability issues, design firms are involved <br /> for the remainder of the <br /> project. <br /> <br /> Cost +/- public bidding ensures +/- public bidding ensures + Involvement of construction +/- If construction started prior to +/- As design and +/-Owner must duplicate <br /> most building for lowest most building for manager in design process final design, phasing of construction are withinsome design costs, in <br /> cost, but full cost not lowest cost, but fullshould lower total cost.construction elements means one firm, total costs order to improve control <br /> known until end of cost not known until However, if project cost is full construction costs not should be lower. Project over quality of project. <br /> project end of project fixed in the design phase, CM known in advance. Public total cost is fixed during Since more conceptual <br /> may include higher bidding ensures most building design phase, without design work is available <br /> contingency than if design for lowest cost, but multiple direct cost competition, when the design/build <br /> were complete. Public bidding contracts reduces overall Contract is awarded on contract is awarded, the <br /> of construction elements can control, firm qualifications andguaranteed price for a <br /> be required to gain cost experience, so there isbuilding should be more <br /> competition, no public bidding predictable. <br /> <br /> Time Sequential design and 0 Sequential design and + Beginning construction prior to + Can save time if elements of ++ As design and + Bridging requires some <br /> bidding take more time; bidding take more completion of design, and project are bid prior to construction are within a design work prior to <br /> change orders during time; more addressing construction completion of design single contractor, the contracting with a design <br /> construction can include cooperative approach efficiency during design project schedule can bebuild firm, so not all the <br /> time delays during construction shortens overall project managed from the schedule advantages of <br /> phase avoids delays schedule, inception of design, design/build are gained. <br /> <br /> Quality + Highest control by owner ++ All parties commit to +/-Early involvement of 0 Quality related to -- Without checks and - Development of basic <br /> and designer during quality and positive construction manager ineffectiveness of the balances between design criteria and intent <br /> project life, but takes resolution of issues as design and cost estimating construction manager/owner'sdesign and construction, provide more quality <br /> effort as contractor a basis for contractual should create consensus on representative in managing owner has limited control control than a pure <br /> selection based on bidand working quality; during construction, design and multiple on quality design/build project. <br /> not performance relationships CM/GC may focus on costcontractors <br /> control at the expense of <br /> quality. <br /> <br /> City Staffing 0/-City has experienced0/- City has experienced +/-Staff requirement unchanged + Can reduce requirements on ++ Greatly reduces City+ Staff requirements <br /> Impact project management project management during design phase. Staff City staff dedicated to project staff requirement afterduring initial design <br /> staff with a recent history staff with a recent involvement changes frommanagement bid is awarded, phase similar to usual <br /> of similarly-sized history of similarly- project administration to design/bid/build process. <br /> projects. Would require sized projects. Would quality control during Staff role limited to <br /> allocation of staff require allocation of construction phase, general design oversight <br /> resources for the life of staff resources for the during construction <br /> the project life of the project phase. <br /> <br />Impact on City's Highest risks to City are Increased Reduces risk of change Increased project Project cost is Project cost is <br />Risk budget, schedule control collaboration to orders due to flaws in coordination and quality risks, negotiated, not bid. negotiated, not bid. <br /> and capability of a reduce risk of delays construction design, butdue to lack of single general Limited City influence on Added cost of two desigr <br /> contractor selected byand increase budget increases risk of CM/GC contractor. Total project cost building design and firms involved in the <br /> the Iow bid process, control for all parties cutting costs and quality not known until final contracts quality after the contract project, and potential <br /> during construction, are bid. is awarded, conflicts over design <br /> intent during constructior <br /> phase. <br /> <br /> <br />