My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: City of Coburg Request for Connection to Regional Wastewater Facilities
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 10/26/05 WS
>
Item A: City of Coburg Request for Connection to Regional Wastewater Facilities
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:00:39 PM
Creation date
10/21/2005 9:41:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/26/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
? <br /> <br />Within 50 days of initiation, a staff report shall be delivered to each member of the <br />Eugene, Springfield and Lane County planning commissions. <br />? <br /> <br />Within 30 days of receipt of the staff report, the planning commissions shall conduct a <br />joint public hearing. <br />? <br /> <br />Within 30 days of the close of the hearing or close of the evidentiary record, the planning <br />commissions shall make a recommendation to their respective governing body. <br />? <br /> <br />Within 30 days of the planning commission recommendations, the elected officials of <br />Eugene, Springfield and Lane County shall conduct a joint public hearing on the <br />amendment. <br />? <br /> <br />Within 30 days of the close of the joint public hearing the elected officials shall approve, <br />modify and approve, or deny the proposal. <br />Strict adherence to this timeline would result in a final decision within 200 days from the <br />initiation preparations. It is not a violation of the Development Code or Metro Plan to take <br />“A different process, time line, or both …may be established by the governing <br />more time: <br />bodies of Springfield, Eugene and Lane County for any government initiated Metro Plan <br />amendment.” <br /> (Springfield Development Code, Article 7, Section 7.110) <br />It is common place, if not entirely without exception, that participants of the Metro Plan <br />amendment process request record extensions at each required public hearing. A minimum of <br />one week and up to 30 days is typically given by the planning commissions for record extension. <br />The hearing before the elected officials is intended to be limited to the record developed at the <br />planning commission hearing, but past practice has never limited testimony. The give and take <br />of new testimony eliciting new questions extends the record several more weeks. The elected <br />officials then reconvene to consider the whole of the record. If no additional questions are raised <br />during the reconvened meeting, the elected officials adjourn to deliberate, usually taking another <br />2-3 weeks before all three governing bodies make a final decision. What under ideal <br />circumstances was designed to take 200 days can easily become 250-300 days. <br />The City of Springfield charges $21,000 for an amendment to the Plan text, and $416 per acre <br />for amendments to the diagram. It is assumed that this fee, on average, will recover <br />approximately 60% of actual cost. This is a complex and precedent-setting action, therefore <br />60% cost recovery will likely be reduced by half or more. This puts the actual costs associated <br />with Planning Division processing closer to $70,000. The number of agency staff, legal counsel, <br />consultants, and public participation that would be involved in this process could add <br />significantly to this cost. An estimate of total costs and time involved is included in Attachment <br />A. It should be noted that if this process becomes similar to the Short Mountain sewer line <br />proposal, costs will increase proportionally. <br /> <br />GOVERNANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL <br />COORDINATION <br />This section addresses how services would be provided and the IGAs that would be needed if the <br />Governing Bodies decide to extend MWMC services to Coburg. As a baseline, the current <br />MWMC IGA would have to be amended to permit MWMC to provide services to Coburg. <br />Development of additional IGAs between Coburg and MWMC, and potentially between Coburg <br />and Eugene and/or Springfield as providers of specific (contractual) services would be necessary <br />depending on the levels of service desired by Coburg. <br /> Page 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.