Laserfiche WebLink
Staff has insufficient information to estimate the level of effort and resources that would be <br />expected to study these issues for the purposes of evaluating Coburg’s request. Therefore, no <br />associated work activities or costs are identified in Attachment A. <br />Collection System And Treatment Facility Capacity <br />The MWMC facilities, and the local wastewater collection systems for Eugene and Springfield, <br />were planned and constructed to serve the anticipated populations within the Eugene-Springfield <br />UGB. Therefore, these facilities, and long-range facilities plans have not accounted for the <br />conveyance and treatment of Coburg’s wastewater. [Note however, Coburg’s wastewater <br />contributions would be minor in comparison to the overall system capacity, under the growth <br />projections presented in Coburg’s Facilities Plan.] The following collection and treatment <br />system capacity issues would need to be addressed. <br />Collection System Capacity <br /> <br />Under the regional treatment alternative, Coburg’s studies show plans to convey wastewater <br />through a force main (i.e., a pressurized pipe fed by a pumping station) that would cross the <br />McKenzie River in the vicinity of Coburg Road, via the old railroad bridge. It would then <br />connect with the Eugene collection system in one of several possible locations. In 2004, a <br />preliminary evaluation was made of the viability of connecting Coburg’s wastewater discharge to <br />the Eugene collection system. Further study would be needed to determine the optimal location <br />for the connection and the extent to which capacity enhancements would be needed in the <br />Eugene local wastewater collection system to handle the increased flows generated from Coburg. <br />Treatment Facility Capacity <br /> <br />In 2004, MWMC completed a 20-year Facilities Plan, which prescribes capital improvements <br />needed to upgrade performance and expand capacity in various parts of the treatment works, <br />biosolids management facilities, and regional pump stations. After over twenty years of <br />operation, the treatment facilities currently experience capacity and environmental performance <br />constraints in certain parts of the facilities under certain seasonal conditions. These capacity <br />constraints include: 1) insufficient capacity during peak wet weather flow events, which has <br />resulted in unpermitted overflows and bypasses in December, 2003; and 2) inadequate solids <br />removal capability during rainy “dry season” months, which has resulted in exceedance of <br />discharge permit limits for solids in May, 2005. Additionally, ammonia limits and temperature <br />management requirements, which were newly added to the discharge permit, have added <br />capacity constraints. All of these issues require construction of improvements to maintain permit <br />compliance for existing sewer users and to add capacity for future users. <br />The capital projects specified in the MWMC Facilities Plan will address the capacity and <br />performance constraints for existing and future users through 2025. If completed in accordance <br />with the adopted schedule, existing capacity constraints would be resolved prior to the estimated <br />time frame of a Coburg connection (i.e. 2008). However, several factors have resulted in <br />significant delays in capital project implementation, putting the MWMC system in greater <br />jeopardy of failure to meet permit limits and key regulatory deadlines. Further study is needed to <br />evaluate the adequacy of MWMC’s construction progress and whether any projects in the 20- <br />year facilities plan would need to be accelerated to accommodate a Coburg connection without <br />significant risk of permit violations. <br /> Page 6 <br /> <br />