Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ATTACHMENT A <br /> -Icn en " n <br /> iil:::! :;;! m > <br /> ii!" 0 In Jan 2005 <br />" -l m ;:; <br />~ "C II m ~ z <br />Ocn "T1 ~ ""ll <br />in' n <br />m Ii Iii (jj r <br />0. n :!! " Feb .. <br />0> gf > en -< Q. <br />iil r ~ .~ ;. <br />N 0. -< Begin 08-11 STIP update, begin data collection, draft performance goals <br />0 CD ~ ~ AJ Mar iif <br />0 0::;1 n <br />'" " ~ ;:r <br /> 011> Data collection continues 3 <br /> -Iii! " Apr CD <br /> 11"8 ;a <br /> 0;:,. ~ <br /> CD II> Data collection complete, compile and review information 0 <br /> ~~ May 0 <br /> ;:,." ODOT HQ develops funding allocation scenarios. ODOT transmits draft Modernization eligibility 0 <br /> 3- ~ -l <br /> CD 3 ::1 <br /> ,,"C June criteria and prioritization factors to ACTs/Lane Co, <br /> -a 0 <br /> 2.ai '" ODOT HQ develops funding allocation recommendation. ACTS/Lane County approve area-specific :!': <br /> g~ ~ July prioritization factors. en <br /> " " ODOT HQ assembles funding allocation materials for stakeholder input and OTC. R-2 ACTs/Lane Co. -l <br /> III - ;; <br /> "C" <br /> o a solicit new Modernization project proposals fr local agencies & ODOT. -l <br /> Ii co 3 <br /> "'iil ODOT HQ distributes funding allocation recommendation to OTC, stakeholders, ACTs, and MPOs. !!. <br /> g 3 S' <br /> OTC approves project eligibility criteria and prioritization factors. ACT Chairs/ Lane Co. meet with m <br /> )> Region 2 Mgr. to develop/modify the Region Large Project Priority list. Region 2 requests /ACTs begin <br /> (') prioritization for Modernization projects. (Ratings must be based on the OTC criteria & factors at a <br /> -I <br /> II Sept minimum.) <br /> ~ OTC/ODOT Management discuss funding allocation and program goals for 08-11 STIP. ACTs begin <br /> II> N <br /> (') ~ refining their prioritized lists of Mod needs. Begin project scoping for Mod (as project lists are <br /> 0 <br /> 3 Oct identified). <br /> 3 <br /> or ACTs, MPOs & others give OTC input about program goals and OTC begins discussion. <br /> III <br /> cr Management Systems prioiritized needs lists are completed by ODOT HQ and submitted to Regions. <br /> " <br /> 0 Noy Continued project scoping for Mod. <br /> " <br /> -I N OTC approves program goals and funding allocations for 08-11 STIP. Region 2 ACTs/Lane County <br /> iil 0 N <br /> " g Dee submit their preliminary prioritized Mod lists to Region. Continued scoping for Mod. 0 <br /> III 0 <br /> "C <br /> 0 N Project selection/scoping begins, region funding targets distributed. Region 2 Mod scoping is ClI) <br /> ;:,. ~ Jan 2006 I <br /> !!l. completed. N <br /> 0' 0 <br /> " Project selection/scoping continues. Region 2 releases preliminary Region recommendation of Mod .... <br /> Feb projects for ACT/Lane County review and comment in early February. .... <br /> VI <br /> ;: Project selection/scoping continues. Region 2 ACTs/Lane County review Region's preliminary Mod -t <br /> " Mar recommendation. =ti <br /> 0 <br /> II Project selection/scoping complete. Region 2 ACTs/Lane County and MPOs provide feedback on C <br /> ;: Apr Region's Mod recommendation to Region staff. m <br /> CD < <br /> a Regions prepare draft program for review by stakeholders. Region 2 staff analyze feedback and m <br /> "C prepare revised Mod proposal. Region 2 releases final Mod proposal to ACTs/Lane County for the Ali- I <br /> g <br /> Iii May Area Meeting by mid-May. 0 <br /> " "'tI <br /> " '" Regions complete draft program for review by stakeholders. Region 2 A11- Area Meeting held to decide 3: <br /> iii ~ <br /> " June Mod project priorities. m <br /> " z <br /> 5' ACTs, MPOs and other stakeholders begin review of draft STIP. ODOT HQ begins funding target-te- <br /> co !!l -t <br /> 0 0 July actual comparison. <br /> .a ... -t <br /> II> Funding target-te-actual comparison process continues. Regions review Draft STIP database with i: <br /> " <br /> N' Aug ACTs, MPOs, other stakeholders m <br /> !!l. .. <br /> 0' N Draft STIP printed, mailed, provided to OTC, regions, the public. Region 2 ACTs/Lane County meet 0 I <br /> " 0 g Z <br /> 8 Sept with the Region Manager to develop/modify the Region 2 Large Project Priority list. ~ m <br /> 0 0 <br /> -I ~ Public review process begins .. <br /> (') Oct !!l <br /> II ;; <br /> 0 Public review process complete; comments summarized. ACTs, MPOs, Regions, OTC review public S' <br /> iil Noy input. ." <br /> co <br /> 0 ;; <br />.... " S <br />~ -I Public comments reviewed by OTC, ACTs, MPOs, Regions. <br />0 iil <br />&' " <br />III <br />3 "C Adjust program if necessary based on OTC direction, funding allocations <br />3 0 <br />" ;:,. <br />I !!l. <br />0' Air quality conformity determinations and modeling begins <br />" Feb <br />" (') <br />9 <br />~ 0 <br />3 Air quality conformity determinations and modeling continues <br />~ 3 Mar <br />li. or <br />III <br />~ 0' Air quality conformity determinations and modeling continues <br />" Apr <br />" <br />" <br />.. Air quality conformity determinations and modeling completed, constrain STIP to estimated available <br />0. 0 <br />i 0 May revenue <br />0 <br />-I l!l Add MPO TIPs, prepare Final STIP for review <br />II <br />i 0 !:l June <br />iil <br />0 co Review of Final STIP by ACTs, MPOs, other stakeholders <br />0 <br />0 " <br />0 0 <br />.... <br />~ CD OTe review and approval of Final STIP, submit to Federal DOT, MTIPs to governor for signature <br />"C <br />~ II> <br />;:,. <br />III 3 <br />CD <br />=l a <br />" ""ll <br />=l a " <br />i '" <br /> m <br />ii <br />" !l. <br />.. <br /> <br />