My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-09-07-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2009
>
Admin Order 58-09-07-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2022 9:26:01 AM
Creation date
9/13/2022 9:25:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
shrubs, and low-level plantings that can be expected to <br />form a multi -layered, closed canopy upon maturity. <br />• 2 rating: 50% - 69% of the setback area is covered by <br />vegetation consisting of a balanced distribution of trees, <br />shrubs, and low-level plantings that can be expected to <br />form a multi -layered, closed canopy upon maturity. <br />• 1 rating: less than 50% of the water quality management <br />area is covered by vegetation consisting of a balanced <br />distribution of trees, shrubs, and low-level plantings that <br />can be expected to form a multi -layered, closed canopy <br />upon maturity. <br />2.3.3. Streambank and Streambed Stability. This category requires the <br />preparer to rate the overall water quality function of the subject lot <br />based on the physical condition of the waterway channel as <br />potential sources of sediment. This category recognizes that lower <br />potential for sedimentation decreases the risks to water quality. If <br />the /WQ Management Area on the subject lot does not include the <br />waterway channel, the rating for this category is "not applicable." <br />If the /WQ Management Area on the subject lot includes only a <br />portion of the waterway channel, the rating applies to the physical <br />condition of that portion only. <br />• 5 rating: No evidence of streambed downcutting or <br />streambank instability. <br />• 4 rating: 1%-5% of length of streambed or streambank <br />on the lot shows evidence of streambed downcutting or <br />streambank instability. <br />• 3 rating: 6%-10% of length of streambed or streambank <br />on the lot shows evidence of streambed downcutting or <br />streambank instability. <br />• 2 rating: 11 %-20% of length of streambed or streambank <br />on the lot shows evidence of streambed downcutting or <br />streambank instability. <br />• 1 rating: More than 20% of length of streambed or <br />streambank on the lot shows evidence of streambed <br />downcutting or streambank instability. <br />2.3.4. Table. The following Water Quality Function Rating Table shall <br />be completed by the preparer consistent with the category <br />descriptions in 2.3.1., 2.3.2. and 2.3.3., above and submitted as part <br />of the Water Quality Function Rating System certification, report <br />or determination. (a) The "Pre -Proposal" column shall be used to <br />quantify the water quality function of the subject lot under pre- <br />proposal/existing conditions. (b) The "Post -Proposal Without <br />Mitigation" column shall be used to quantify water quality <br />function of the subject lot under those conditions that would exist <br />Administrative Order - Page 10 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.