Laserfiche WebLink
<br />one of the highest callings of government was to protect citizens from harm and all citizens deserved equal <br />protection. He urged the council to implement, maintain, and enforce the intent of the original smoking <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Tony Biglan, 2324 West 28th Avenue, provided a handout to the council. He related that he had been a <br />witness in the US Justice Department lawsuit against tobacco companies for the past four years. He noted <br />that the handout featured a chart of the 400,000 annual deaths due to cigarette smoking but it did not <br />indicate the 50,000 people who died of diseases related to secondhand smoke. He said tobacco companies <br />spent $15 billion marketing their products in the last year reported, $3 billion more than they did the <br />previous year. He stated that the cigarette companies routinely and "lavishly" funded other groups such as <br />state restaurant associations and convenience store owners to fight restrictions on the marketing of <br />cigarettes. He said, faced with restrictions on its marketing to teens, it expanded its marketing through <br />bars. He observed that the cigarette industry spends huge sums of money each year to counteract the bad <br />impression that killing 450,000 people annually made. He reviewed the tobacco industry's smoking <br />prevention efforts and he provided written documentation to the council that the purported efforts to <br />prevent smoking were actually focused on trying to influence opinion leaders to believe that the cigarette <br />industry had become a good corporate citizen. He declared it had not. He said the activities of Phillip <br />Morris locally illustrated the massive resources the company supplied to make it safe to market cigarettes. <br />He stressed that Eugene was a college town and reiterated that the new massive marketing strategy was <br />directed toward college students. <br /> <br />Dr. Sarah Hendrickson, 1036 Adams Street, Lane County Public Health Officer, commended the council <br />for approving the smoking ordinance in 2000. She underscored that the ordinance declared that employers <br />were required to provide for all employees a place to work in which employees were not exposed to the <br />smoking of others. She noted that after the Eugene ordinance was adopted, the tobacco industry helped to <br />pass a law that prevented other counties and jurisdictions in Oregon from doing this "same wonderful <br />thing" for worker protection. Dr. Hendrickson recalled that five years earlier, doctors and health care <br />workers provided the same testimony as the council heard at the present meeting. She said the council had <br />done a good job and passed the right law. Since then, she averred, the worker protection goals had been <br />undermined and, under pressure, administrators made a rule that 25 percent of outdoor smoking areas <br />should be exposed to the air. She stated that there was no scientific justification for this rule. She thought <br />the 25 percent rule had been extended far beyond smoking porches for bar customers and pictures <br />submitted to the council had demonstrated this. Dr. Hendrickson asserted that the complaint-driven <br />process put employees at risk of losing their jobs and the entity that took the complaints, Lane County <br />Public Health Department, had lost its enforcement ability when the State lost its tobacco money and had <br />lost its focus with the tragic events of September 11. She cautioned the council against codifying a <br />definition of the outdoors as changing that ordinance could open it to complaints against the original law. <br />She recommended leaving it in an administrative rule. She suggested percentages be left out, as anything <br />codified could be used as a nation-wide example and even 50 percent air exposure was not ideal. <br /> <br />Wendy Watson, 33604 Indian Drive, Coburg, stated that she worked in the bar industry for 15 years. She <br />recalled that five years earlier she collected over 100 signatures from restaurant and bar workers in the <br />city of Eugene that supported the idea of being able to work in a smoke-free environment. She said this <br />time she had collected interviews of workers, owners, and their family members, copies of which she <br />provided to the council. She quoted Dave Lawrence, bar manager of Chantrelles, who said the ordinance <br />had a positive influence on his health and a negligible effect on his income. She related that he felt <br />smoking rooms were chiefly a way to circumvent the law. She also quoted Jeff Morganthaler, who <br />worked at the Vets Club, Tiny Tavern, and Black Forest, who thought rooms not open to the open air <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council <br />Regular Session <br /> <br />September 26, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br />