Laserfiche WebLink
<br />downland side was Wendell Lane and its infrastructure. He related that the Environment, Social, <br />Economic and Energy (ESEE) report stated that the property met none of the criteria with the exception of <br />possible contiguous water. He maintained that there was no water, noting that he had supplied the council <br />with pictures of the property. <br /> <br />Roxie Cuellar, 2053 Laura Street, Springfield, representing the Home Builders Association of Lane <br />County, requested the record be kept open for a minimum of one week or ten days, if possible. She <br />related that the Home Builders Association's (HBA) big issue was the effect it could have on the buildable <br />land supply. She averred that the City determined the impact on an inventory that existed ten years <br />earlier. She said the City needed to look at the impact it would have on the inventory of today. She <br />recalled that City Attorney Glenn Klein said that running out of buildable lands would not present a legal <br />problem but it would present a policy issue. She asserted that the City would run out of buildable land <br />before it got out of this planning period and if the City ran out of land it would have been due to a choice <br />the City had made. She encouraged the council, on behalf of the HBA, to take a "good look at what the <br />problem is." <br /> <br />Ms. Cuellar said that the study completed in 1999 using 1995 data made assumptions that were not true. <br />She said one assumption was that every piece of vacant land would be available and would have a willing <br />seller. She said another assumption in the study was that housing could be built at the same density on <br />slopes as flat land, nearly seven units per net acre. She averred this just did not happen. She noted that <br />Springfield made the assumption that it would build four units per net acre on 25 percent slopes and she <br />felt this to be more reasonable. Ms. Cuellar said another assumption in the study was that single-family <br />detached homes would make up 40 percent of new construction during the 20-year planning period. She <br />countered that such homes consistently comprised 58 percent of new construction. She emphasized that <br />the builders were running out of land and the land available was increasingly sloped instead of flat. She <br />remarked that it took a long time to go from a decision to expand the urban growth boundary (UGB) to the <br />point where there are new lots to build on. <br /> <br />Doug Weber, 1330 Flint Ridge Avenue, said he was speaking as a citizen but felt he should note that he <br />was principal engineer for Weber Eliot Engineers. He understood that State law required communities <br />with a comprehensive plan to keep a 20-year supply of buildable lands and keep the inventory updated. <br />He did not believe that the City of Eugene knew how much buildable lands were available. He thought it <br />appeared that staff and council had been avoiding or ignoring this requirement. He averred that simply <br />manipulating density figures on paper was an insult to all of the community. He said he lived in the Ferry <br />Street Bridge area and had been looking for a buildable lot in that area with no success. He asserted that a <br />single builder would subdivide land and keep all of the lots and because of this it was not possible for an <br />individual to buy a lot and build for themselves. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber observed that the cost oflots had increased dramatically and attributed this to the laws of <br />supply and demand. He pointed out that as a civil engineer he built infrastructure to serve new housing <br />and currently most of his business was in nearby towns such as Cottage Grove, Junction City, and <br />Creswell. He opined that the City was directly responsible for pushing Eugene workers into outlying <br />communities, which defeated the original intent of statewide planning goals of compact urban growth and <br />a reduction in vehicle miles traveled. He felt the residential lands inventory needed attention and using <br />data from 1995 as the basis for the current periodic review was evasive of public law and disingenuous on <br />the part of the council as holders of the public trust and a "transparent attempt to stamp your agenda on <br />the community." <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council <br />Regular Session <br /> <br />September 26, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />