My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Public Hearing on Ordinance Establishing Chambers Special Area Zone
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 11/14/05 Mtg
>
Item 5: Public Hearing on Ordinance Establishing Chambers Special Area Zone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:52:35 PM
Creation date
11/10/2005 9:24:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />LOWE Allen D <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Cc: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Scarafina 1 @aol.com <br />Monday, November 07,200510:59 AM <br />*Eugene Mayor and City Council <br />LOWE Allen D; Scarafina1@aol.com <br />Testimony in Support of Chambers Special Area Zone <br /> <br />Monday, Nov. 7, 2005 <br />To: Mayor and CC@ci.eugene.or.us <br />From: Carol DeFazio scarafina1@aol.com <br />Subject: Testimony in Support of Chambers Special Area Zone <br />Cc: Allen.D.Lowe@ci.eugene.or.us <br /> <br />Testimony in Support of Chambers Special Area Zone <br /> <br />November 5, 2005 <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Piercy and Councilors: <br /> <br />Until the current Chambers MUC study, I had not actively participated in a <br />public process. <br />When the Chambers Node project began in Autumn of 2004, I first thought <br />UThey've already got it figured out. The public process is just a formality." <br /> <br />However, early conversations with neighbors and my attendance at the first <br />public meetings of the CNR planted in my mind the possibility that this time it <br />could be different. It appeared that the city, the staff, and the consultants <br />truly wanted our participation to deal with a challenging problem. A <br />substantial group of committed neighbors were ready and willing to take it on. <br /> <br />Having lived in Eugene since 1965 (in my current home since 1976), I had <br />firsthand experience of our inner city neighborhood. I was acutely aware of its <br />fragility, having witnessed over the years the profound negative impact of <br />each thoughtlessly designed uinfill" project that came into the area. The <br />prospect of more to come distressed me. I felt it was important to the city to <br />have healthy, stable neighborhoods surrounding the downtown core. I also felt <br />it was vital to the cultural life of the city to maintain our diverse older <br />neighborhoods. The first rule of progress, someone has said, is to not lose <br />what we already have. It seemed to me that we were letting a treasure slip away. <br /> <br />Was anyone paying attention to the on-the-ground reality of our neighborhood? <br /> <br />Could we neighbors work together to halt its inevitable deterioration and <br />decline? <br /> <br />In the Chambers Reconsidered project, I saw an opportunity to address these <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Throughout this process, as a member of CAFHN's Steering Committee, my goal <br />has been to encourage all of us---neighbors, consultants, staff, Planning <br />commission and Council---to look beyond the false perception that we must <br />sacrifice neighborhoods or have urban sprawl. What we really need are actions that <br />support healthy neighborhoods so as to encourage compact growth. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.