My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: City Hall/Police Building Priority Issue
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 11/23/05 WS
>
Item B: City Hall/Police Building Priority Issue
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:12:09 PM
Creation date
11/16/2005 3:19:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/23/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2/6 <br /> <br />The City of Sacramento, California, is currently in the process of moving into their <br />renovated City Hall Complex. There was never much doubt that the original 1912 City <br />Hall Building would remain and be renovated. The annex to this building was of a later <br />vintage and was slated for demolition, but the 1912 building was an ornate structure with <br />many historical features. Major improvements were undertaken to make the building <br />much safer to occupy but some of the more rigorous seismic requirements could not be <br />achieved. The city staff was relocated to temporary facilities for a period of 2 years <br />while the 34,000 square foot building was renovated at a cost of 11 million dollars. <br /> <br />Across the plaza from the renovated City Hall sits the newly finished 267,000 sf, 5-story <br />city administration building. This structure has underground parking and was built for <br />approximately 50 million dollars. <br /> <br />Robert Williamson <br />Supervising Architect <br />City of Sacramento, <br />California <br /> <br />The City of Bellevue, Washington developed a feasibility study to determine their course <br />of action to provide a new city hall complex. The options were: <br />1) Build a new building on a vacant parcel of land <br />2) Renovate or build new on an existing city owned site. <br />3) Purchase an existing building and renovate it. <br /> <br />The city decided that option 3 was the best choice because of a unique set of <br />circumstances. The city was able to purchase an existing building that was an excellent <br />fit for their needs. The location was suitable, the building's price was less than market <br />value, and the building's infrastructure was robust. The building's previous owner and <br />occupant was a telecommunications company, so the building's wiring system was <br />transferable and superb. A backup generator and related systems were already installed. <br />The HV AC system, including a hot and cold water supply infrastructure met the City <br />needs with only boiler and chiller upgrades. Some seismic improvements were needed, <br />but other factors such as the building's age and purchase price mitigated the impact of <br />this work. Since the building was not occupied, costs to relocate city staff during the <br />renovation were not a factor. As is typical with building renovation work there were <br />surprises along the way, and added costs for unforeseen upgrades to the infrastructure did <br />occur. <br /> <br />Frank Pinney <br />Facilities Planning Manager <br />City of Bellevue, W A <br /> <br />V:541-686-2031 P.O. Box 24705 Eugene, OR 97402 <br /> <br />Fax: 541-686-3392 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.